: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:07 PM
To: David Viner
Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] new webdav patch
Hi
> I think allowing php users to process webdav methods in user-space is an
> awesome idea. One question I have, why are the MKCOL, DELETE, and UNLOCK
> me
Hi
> I think allowing php users to process webdav methods in user-space is an
> awesome idea. One question I have, why are the MKCOL, DELETE, and UNLOCK
> methods not listed? according to RFC 2518
> (http://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/webdav/protocol/rfc2518.txt), DAV clients
> are required to sup
st 20, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Rasmus Lerdorf
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] new webdav patch
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >
> > > It is getting there. You are checking for POST under webdav_methods
when
>
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >
> > > It is getting there. You are checking for POST under webdav_methods when
> > > POST is already allowed by default, so it is a redundant strcmp().
> >
> > oops. that one slipped through and was cer
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> > It is getting there. You are checking for POST under webdav_methods when
> > POST is already allowed by default, so it is a redundant strcmp().
>
> oops. that one slipped through and was certainly not intended to be there
> :)
>
> > Anybody else
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> It is getting there. You are checking for POST under webdav_methods when
> POST is already allowed by default, so it is a redundant strcmp().
oops. that one slipped through and was certainly not intended to be there
:)
> Anybody else here have an is
It is getting there. You are checking for POST under webdav_methods when
POST is already allowed by default, so it is a redundant strcmp().
Otherwise your patch looks ok.
Anybody else here have an issue with adding this configue option which
will allows webdav methods through to be handled in us
