[PHP-DEV] how to call a website from within a php script

2003-02-16 Thread christian tischler
Can anybody tell me how to call a website from within a php script.


Meaning: how to forward to a website, or if something happens then goto
that website.

hope it is clear now

not just new to php but news groups also...

christian





-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: call website from php script

2003-02-16 Thread christian tischler
please delete


Christian Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Can anybody tell me how to call a website from within aphp script.

 not just new to php but news groups also...

 christian





-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: call a website from within a php script

2003-02-16 Thread christian tischler
please delete

Christian Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

 From: christian tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: call website from php script
 Date: 14 February 2003 21:59

 Can anybody tell me how to call a website from within a php script.

 not just new to php but news groups also...

 christian







-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: how to call a website from within a php script

2003-02-16 Thread christian tischler
please delete

Christian Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Can anybody tell me how to call a website from within a php script.


 Meaning: how to forward to a website, or if something happens then goto
 that website.

 hope it is clear now

 not just new to php but news groups also...

 christian







-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php





[PHP-DEV] Re: iopy,

2003-02-16 Thread christian tischler
please delete

Christian Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 yu,pu





-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] database select

2003-02-16 Thread Hans Prins
Hello,

Im trying to select only one row in a mysql database (in this case a poll
with the smallest pollID)...
Each row has a field called pollID which is the primary key and is auto
incremented when a new row is inserted.

I could possible do the following but I think its a bit extensive:

$query = SELECT * FROM polls ORDER BY pollID ASC;
$result = mysql_query($query);
for ($count = 0; $count  1 $count++) {
$data = mysql_fetch_array($result);
$pollID = $data['pollID'];
}
$query = SELECT * FROM polls WHERE pollID = $pollID;

Does anyone now a solution for this that requires less code?

Thx






-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] how to call a website from within a php script

2003-02-16 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
christian tischler wrote:
 Can anybody tell me how to call a website from within a php script.

  Please ask user questions on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.

-- 
  Sebastian Bergmann
  http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/

  Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] database select

2003-02-16 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Hans Prins wrote:
 [...]

  Please ask user questions on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.

-- 
  Sebastian Bergmann
  http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/

  Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / run-tests.php /ext/curlinterface.c streams.c /ext/fbsql php_fbsql.c /ext/ftp ftp.c /ext/hyperwavehg_comm.c hw.c /ext/imap php_imap.c /ext/ldap ldap.c /ext/

2003-02-16 Thread Wez Furlong
Should be fixed now.

If any more of these occur, the problem is that winsock2.h needs to be
included before windows.h (which itself includes winsock.h).
I noticed that some source files include the winsock headers twice, so
there is probably some spring cleaning that can be done.

I have included winsock2.h as one of the first things in php.h, so
the large majority of all other .c files probably don't even need to
include it explicitly anymore.

--Wez.

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:

 Wez Furlong wrote:
  Log:
  A add much more useful select(2) implementation than is provided by
  windows sockets.

   This broke the build for me.

   I get 1500+ errors that look like this one:

 c:\programme\microsoft sdk\include\winsock2.h(2478): error C2375:
 'WSAAsyncGetHostByName': Redefinition; different binding;
 c:\programme\microsoft sdk\include\winsock.h(925):
 See declaration of 'WSAAsyncGetHostByName'

 --
   Sebastian Bergmann
   http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/

   Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/

 --
 PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php





-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
Hello,

I made a new extension to work with dates, you may find infossources
here:
Docs: http://www.pearfr.org/php_date/docs/
Sources: http://www.pearfr.org/php_date/sources/

This is a alpha release, a first shot. I still have to create a full set
of tests script.

The idea is to provide a fullfeatured date/time standart extension with
php5.

A non documented function is get_isoweek() which returns the ISO week
number. But the weeknumber is a thing we have to discuss, because there
are tons of way to represent it. Actually the week #1 is the week where
fit 4th of january.

For all date_new_xxx functions, an optionnal arg can be set to define
the 1st day week, default is monday.

Todo:
- strftime()
- add/clean warnings (overflow, invalid dates,...)
- add times functions
  This part is real pain if we want to DST times, localtime and so on.

- add time_span datatype, which represents a time interval in days,
  hours, seconds, and related functions

- add a true crossplatform localisations, which does not depend of the
  target platform. That will make our life easier to provide date
  localisations in any cases.

Usefull but not really needed:
- add additionnals functions for specials days and official hollydays

any comments, ideas, feedback ?

pierre

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] solaris getcwd() brokeness

2003-02-16 Thread James E. Flemer
When getcwd() fails in certain places, we end up passing a
zero length cwd_state to virtual_file_ex().  This causes
virtual_file_ex() to assume the path to be /, thus:
  include(foo.php);
ends up trying to open, /foo.php, which is wrong.  If you
want to play with this problem, its very easy to simulate
on a non-broken environment, just do:
  #define VCWD_GETCWD(buff, size)  (EACCES)
(or to a func that returns EACCES in case VCWD_GETCWD() is
ever used).

-James

On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:

 Hey,

 The fchdir() part of the patch looks fine but I didn't quite understand the
 rest. PHP only uses realpath() if it doesn't fail, so what is the exact
 problem? What does that other code do?

 Andi

 At 03:29 PM 2/12/2003 -0500, James E. Flemer wrote:
 Well all the fancy new streams code in 4.3.0 seems to
 tickle a Solaris issue with getcwd().  It seems that under
 certain cases solaris' getcwd() fails when other os' work.
 Consequently 4.3.0 causes a huge ammount of breakage for
 some sites running solaris.  Below is a patch that seems to
 work around the problem.  This may not be the best
 approach, but it was an attempt at a quick-fix so that
 4.3.0 would be usable for now.  This problem has bug
 number: #21310 [1].  Comments welcome.  I'd like to commit
 this (or similar) before any more releases are made.
 
 -James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [1] http://bugs.php.net/21310
 
 ]] Patch sponsored by: The University of Vermont [[
 Index: TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c
 ===
 RCS file: /repository/TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.41
 diff -u -b -u -r1.41 tsrm_virtual_cwd.c
 --- TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c 6 Nov 2002 18:07:22 -   1.41
 +++ TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c 12 Feb 2003 04:39:11 -
 @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
  return (0);
 
   #if !defined(TSRM_WIN32)  !defined(NETWARE)
 -   if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length)) {
 +   if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length) || (state-cwd_length  1))
 {
  if (use_realpath  realpath(path, resolved_path)) {
  path = resolved_path;
  path_length = strlen(path);
 @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@
  }
 
 
 +  if (state-cwd_length  0 || IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length)) {
  ptr = tsrm_strtok_r(path_copy, TOKENIZER_STRING, tok);
  while (ptr) {
  ptr_length = strlen(ptr);
 @@ -416,6 +417,11 @@
  state-cwd[state-cwd_length+1] = '\0';
  state-cwd_length++;
  }
 +  } else {
 +   state-cwd = (char *) realloc(state-cwd, path_length+1);
 +   memcpy(state-cwd, path, path_length+1);
 +   state-cwd_length = path_length;
 +  }
 
  if (verify_path  verify_path(state)) {
  CWD_STATE_FREE(state);
 Index: main/main.c
 ===
 RCS file: /repository/php4/main/main.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.512.2.5
 diff -u -b -u -r1.512.2.5 main.c
 --- main/main.c 16 Dec 2002 15:44:06 -  1.512.2.5
 +++ main/main.c 12 Feb 2003 04:39:12 -
 @@ -1507,7 +1507,11 @@
   {
  zend_file_handle *prepend_file_p, *append_file_p;
  zend_file_handle prepend_file, append_file;
 +#ifdef VIRTUAL_DIR
  char *old_cwd;
 +#else
 +   int old_cwd_fd;
 +#endif
  char *old_primary_file_path = NULL;
  int retval = 0;
 
 @@ -1515,9 +1519,11 @@
  if (php_handle_special_queries(TSRMLS_C)) {
  return 0;
  }
 +#ifdef VIRTUAL_DIR
   #define OLD_CWD_SIZE 4096
  old_cwd = do_alloca(OLD_CWD_SIZE);
  old_cwd[0] = '\0';
 +#endif
 
  zend_try {
   #ifdef PHP_WIN32
 @@ -1528,7 +1534,11 @@
 
  if (primary_file-type == ZEND_HANDLE_FILENAME
   primary_file-filename) {
 +#ifdef VIRTUAL_DIR
  VCWD_GETCWD(old_cwd, OLD_CWD_SIZE-1);
 +#else
 +   old_cwd_fd = open(., 0);
 +#endif
  VCWD_CHDIR_FILE(primary_file-filename);
  }
 
 @@ -1578,10 +1588,14 @@
 
  } zend_end_try();
 
 +#ifdef VIRTUAL_DIR
  if (old_cwd[0] != '\0') {
  VCWD_CHDIR(old_cwd);
  }
  free_alloca(old_cwd);
 +#else
 +   fchdir(old_cwd_fd);
 +#endif
  return retval;
   }
   /* }}} */
 Index: main/safe_mode.c
 ===
 RCS file: /repository/php4/main/safe_mode.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.51
 diff -u -b -u -r1.51 safe_mode.c
 --- main/safe_mode.c6 Nov 2002 18:07:23 -   1.51
 +++ main/safe_mode.c12 Feb 2003 04:39:12 -
 @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@
  VCWD_REALPATH(filename, path);
  *s = DEFAULT_SLASH;
  } else {
 +   path[0] = '.';
 +   path[1] = '\0';
  VCWD_GETCWD(path, 

Re: [PHP-DEV] new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
hello,

As a side note, the date range starts on 1/1/1 and ends on 31/12/65535.

pierre

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread Vlad Krupin
Looks interesting. A lot of functions though. Would it make sense to at 
least remove all date_sub_* () functions in favor of using the 
date_add_* () counterparts with negative values? E.g. date_add_days(-10) 
does the same as date_sub_days(10) ? One of the easy ways to reduce 
usability of an extension is to include a lot of functions that do basic 
(and often overlapping) functions.

Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:

hello,

As a side note, the date range starts on 1/1/1 and ends on 31/12/65535.


Y65K bug, anyone? :)


Vlad


--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread Theo Spears
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 16:17, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
 hello,
 
 As a side note, the date range starts on 1/1/1 and ends on 31/12/65535.
 
 pierre

What about BCE dates? Wouldn't it be more sensible to allow between
31/12/-32767 to 31/12/32767

Theo Spears


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] solaris getcwd() brokeness

2003-02-16 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:41 PM 2/13/2003 -0500, James E. Flemer wrote:

RCS file: /repository/TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -b -r1.41 tsrm_virtual_cwd.c
--- TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c 6 Nov 2002 18:07:22 -   1.41
+++ TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c 13 Feb 2003 20:40:07 -
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
return (0);

 #if !defined(TSRM_WIN32)  !defined(NETWARE)
-   if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length)) {
+   if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length) || (state-cwd_length  1)) {
if (use_realpath  realpath(path, resolved_path)) {
path = resolved_path;
path_length = strlen(path);


Will realpath() work in cases where getcwd() didn't work? (btw it's nicer 
to check state-cwd_length == 0 than  1 IMO).

@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@
}


+  if (state-cwd_length  0 || IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length)) {
ptr = tsrm_strtok_r(path_copy, TOKENIZER_STRING, tok);
while (ptr) {
ptr_length = strlen(ptr);
@@ -416,6 +417,11 @@
state-cwd[state-cwd_length+1] = '\0';
state-cwd_length++;
}
+  } else {
+   state-cwd = (char *) realloc(state-cwd, path_length+1);
+   memcpy(state-cwd, path, path_length+1);
+   state-cwd_length = path_length;
+  }


I'm trying to think if there's some other way of doing this. What is the 
main problem in this loop? Does it add  / or c:\ in the beginning of the 
string?

Andi


--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] solaris getcwd() brokeness

2003-02-16 Thread James E. Flemer
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:

 At 03:41 PM 2/13/2003 -0500, James E. Flemer wrote:
 RCS file: /repository/TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.41
 diff -u -b -r1.41 tsrm_virtual_cwd.c
 --- TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c 6 Nov 2002 18:07:22 -   1.41
 +++ TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.c 13 Feb 2003 20:40:07 -
 @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
  return (0);
 
   #if !defined(TSRM_WIN32)  !defined(NETWARE)
 -   if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length)) {
 +   if (IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length) || (state-cwd_length  1)) {
  if (use_realpath  realpath(path, resolved_path)) {
  path = resolved_path;
  path_length = strlen(path);

 Will realpath() work in cases where getcwd() didn't work? (btw it's nicer
 to check state-cwd_length == 0 than  1 IMO).

Most realpath() implementations call getcwd();  realpath()
on Solaris seems to, so it fails too.

 @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@
  }
 
 
 +  if (state-cwd_length  0 || IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(path, path_length)) {
  ptr = tsrm_strtok_r(path_copy, TOKENIZER_STRING, tok);
  while (ptr) {
  ptr_length = strlen(ptr);
 @@ -416,6 +417,11 @@
  state-cwd[state-cwd_length+1] = '\0';
  state-cwd_length++;
  }
 +  } else {
 +   state-cwd = (char *) realloc(state-cwd, path_length+1);
 +   memcpy(state-cwd, path, path_length+1);
 +   state-cwd_length = path_length;
 +  }

 I'm trying to think if there's some other way of doing this. What is the
 main problem in this loop? Does it add  / or c:\ in the beginning of the
 string?

Yes, that loop adds prefix of /.  Like I said, this
probably is not the cleanest solution, but it was quick and
got 4.3 running for now.  I am open to suggestions on
improvement.  One thought of mine was to wrap getcwd() so
that when it fails, it would return ., and then make sure
that nothing *needed* absolute paths.  (I believe the
_once() functions will not like this, or may end up
allowing the same file included multiple times w/o the help
of realpath().)

I sort of wonder why PHP does uses getcwd()/realpath() so
much.  It is commonly recomended to use open(.) and
fchdir() for a directory stack.  Resolving every single
opened file with realpath() seems a waste.  I saw some
discussion on this last month (Subj: Reducing the number of
system calls ...).  If the main issue was _once(), would it
be possible to use inodes to prevent multiple inclusion?
(You'd still need a fstat() to get inodes but no realpath()
or getcwd().)

-James




-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:58:52 -0800
Vlad Krupin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Looks interesting. A lot of functions though. Would it make sense to
 at least remove all date_sub_* () functions in favor of using the 
 date_add_* () counterparts with negative values? E.g.
 date_add_days(-10) does the same as date_sub_days(10) ? One of the
 easy ways to reduce usability of an extension is to include a lot of
 functions that do basic (and often overlapping) functions.

This is better for the readability of the source, especially while
working with dates or ranges. Internally two different functions are
used. That sounds more logical to my mind to substract 10 days instead
to add a negative span ;-).

Note I have received request for a normalize add/sub method which
accepts 1month 2days or -1year 4months, which can be added soon, as
well as an OO interface.

For the interface itself, I have made a merge of what we can find in
others langages, like python or perl, I did not implement everything I
found, but everything I currently need. One of the goals, except to
enlarge the dates limit, was to provide usefulleasy to use functions.

thank's for the feedback,

pierre

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread moshe doron
Pierre,
u catching me a moment before i'm commiting date_sunrise(), date_sunset() functions, 
as agreed on the list.
do we have a naming conflict here?

moshe.
-- 


Pierre-Alain Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hello,
 
 I made a new extension to work with dates, you may find infossources
 here:
 Docs: http://www.pearfr.org/php_date/docs/
 Sources: http://www.pearfr.org/php_date/sources/
 
 This is a alpha release, a first shot. I still have to create a full set
 of tests script.
 
 The idea is to provide a fullfeatured date/time standart extension with
 php5.
 
 A non documented function is get_isoweek() which returns the ISO week
 number. But the weeknumber is a thing we have to discuss, because there
 are tons of way to represent it. Actually the week #1 is the week where
 fit 4th of january.
 
 For all date_new_xxx functions, an optionnal arg can be set to define
 the 1st day week, default is monday.
 
 Todo:
 - strftime()
 - add/clean warnings (overflow, invalid dates,...)
 - add times functions
   This part is real pain if we want to DST times, localtime and so on.
 
 - add time_span datatype, which represents a time interval in days,
   hours, seconds, and related functions
 
 - add a true crossplatform localisations, which does not depend of the
   target platform. That will make our life easier to provide date
   localisations in any cases.
 
 Usefull but not really needed:
 - add additionnals functions for specials days and official hollydays
 
 any comments, ideas, feedback ?
 
 pierre


Re: [PHP-DEV] new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On 16 Feb 2003 20:17:13 +
Theo Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 16:17, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
  hello,
  
  As a side note, the date range starts on 1/1/1 and ends on
  31/12/65535.
  
  pierre
 
 What about BCE dates? Wouldn't it be more sensible to allow between
 31/12/-32767 to 31/12/32767

Playing with months days is completly hazardous with BC dates, even
with dates lower then certain centuries, check the calendar FAQ :).

This choice makes the algorithm easier to implement and faster, the
structure of date/time structire too. It seems this is the way others
men people choosed too for their respective langage or APIs.

As far as I remember, archaeological applications do not use this
structure to store dating datas in an atomic manner.

Note this is an internal limit, logic tells us to do not believe the 1st
january of 340 was a monday for the people who lived during this old
times ;-)), regardless to the algorithm you use. The goals here were
more to work a date after 2038 and before 1970.

thank's for the feedbacks

hth

pierre

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: new Date extenstion

2003-02-16 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:04:50 +0200
moshe doron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Pierre,
 u catching me a moment before i'm commiting date_sunrise(),
 date_sunset() functions, as agreed on the list. do we have a naming
 conflict here?

No, I answered for 2 reasons, the 1st was to respect the new naming
convention, the 2nd was to integrate them easily in this new extension
:-).

Currently the namespace will be time_foo for the time functions. I took
care about your new functions while preparing (still on the fire) the
next steps (time functions).

Indeed, you are welcome to help me :-).

pierre


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] make the win32 project working again after date_sun*()'s

2003-02-16 Thread moshe doron
http://212.199.221.100/moshe/win32project-sunfuncs.patch.txt

-- 




Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] make the win32 project working again afterdate_sun*()'s

2003-02-16 Thread Wez Furlong
I'll do this now.

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, moshe doron wrote:

 http://212.199.221.100/moshe/win32project-sunfuncs.patch.txt

 --




-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: php4 /ext/standard/tests/general_functions sunfuncts.phpt

2003-02-16 Thread moshe doron
looks to me unnecessary, since the sixts parameter is the offset.

-- 


Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:cvssniper1045461063@cvsserver...
 sniper Mon Feb 17 00:51:03 2003 EDT
 
   Modified files:  
 /php4/ext/standard/tests/general_functions sunfuncts.phpt 
   Log:
   Assuming the results were created in system with Asia/Jerusalem as TZ
   
 Index: php4/ext/standard/tests/general_functions/sunfuncts.phpt
 diff -u php4/ext/standard/tests/general_functions/sunfuncts.phpt:1.2 
php4/ext/standard/tests/general_functions/sunfuncts.phpt:1.3
 --- php4/ext/standard/tests/general_functions/sunfuncts.phpt:1.2 Mon Feb 17 00:02:05 
2003
 +++ php4/ext/standard/tests/general_functions/sunfuncts.phpt Mon Feb 17 00:51:03 
2003
 @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
  precision = 14
  --FILE--
  ?
 +
 +putenv (TZ=Asia/Jerusalem);
 +
  for($a=1;$a=12;$a++){
   echo 
date_sunrise(mktime(1,1,1,$a,1,2003),SUNFUNCS_RET_TIMESTAMP,31.76670,35.23330,90.83,2).
 ;
   echo 
date_sunrise(mktime(1,1,1,$a,1,2003),SUNFUNCS_RET_STRING,31.76670,35.23330,90.83,2). 
;
 
 


Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: php4 /ext/standard/tests/general_functionssunfuncts.phpt

2003-02-16 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, moshe doron wrote:

looks to me unnecessary, since the sixts parameter is the offset.

It affects mktime() and as that timestamp is used to 
generate the SUNFUNCS_RET_TIMESTAMP part of the test,
if it differs, the test fails.

--Jani


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php