At 02:50 PM 4/29/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
So it's probably not a lot more random than it was before...
I think it is because the time of the rinit()'s are different now (unless
some of them run at exactly the same time).
Andi
Zeev
At 15:44 29/4/2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 02:35 PM 4
Hi,
Can you please check the following bug report?
http://www.php.net/bugs.php?id=10458edit=1
Thanks,
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators,
Guys,
I think that despite the release of 4.0.5 tomorrow we are pretty close to
having an RC1 for 4.0.6. Lots of things have been fixed/added since 4.0.5
(check the NEWS file).
Can we make a list of things which still need to make it into 4.0.6 before
we branch?
Andi
--
PHP Development
At 09:42 PM 4/29/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
This is the line in question:
php_srand(time(0) * getpid() * (php_combined_lcg() * 1.0));
This is now (in my patch) in RINIT and thus it is a different pid
it doesn't matter if the RINIT happens the same second..
Or did I misunderstood
You are confused :)
What you did is:
echo expr1 . expr2;
meaning echo the expr1 concatenated with expr2. Both expressions are
evaluated before the concatenation occurs. so print_r(posix_uname()) is
evaluated first and prints out the posix uname info. The return value is 1
for success so what
At 10:01 PM 4/29/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 09:42 PM 4/29/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
This is the line in question:
php_srand(time(0) * getpid() * (php_combined_lcg() * 1.0));
This is now (in my patch) in RINIT and thus
At 10:09 PM 4/29/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Guys,
I think that despite the release of 4.0.5 tomorrow we are pretty close to
having an RC1 for 4.0.6. Lots of things have been fixed/added since 4.0.5
(check the NEWS file).
Can we make
At 04:06 AM 4/29/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Guys,
I think that despite the release of 4.0.5 tomorrow we are pretty close to
having an RC1 for 4.0.6. Lots of things have been fixed/added since 4.0.5
(check the NEWS file).
Can we make
Please also address the maintainers (written on the top of the .c file) to
make sure this gets the right attention.
Andi
At 01:24 AM 4/30/2001 +0200, Johan Ekenberg wrote:
Hi!
I've been working a lot with the imap_*() functions in PHP lately, and have
discovered a few shortcomings in the
Can you give an example of how it looks with request_uri and how it looks
with both? Then it'll be easier for someone like me who doesn't know the
standard too well to check the PHP manual and the HTTP standard to see what
the correct behavior should be.
Andi
At 07:55 AM 4/29/2001 -0400,
At 11:36 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, James Moore wrote:
snip
K I have a list of bugs that need to be at least reviewed by the appropraite
developers, this list needs to be added to/altered etc can you please send
feedback on which issues should be fixed before 4.0.6, there are some there
that will not be
At 12:20 AM 4/28/2001 -0500, Brian Foddy wrote:
Both were compiled with debug ON. I'll try them off.
I'm away for the weekend but will try it Sunday night or Monday.
There is a known bug that if you load a shared library with dl(), compiled
with debug and it leaks memory that it will crash.
At 08:28 AM 4/28/2001 -0400, Joe Brown wrote:
Having said that,
1. is there a good reason OCI shouldn't free the resource reguardless of the
reference count?
There are different ways to look at this. Some people might think it should
and some might think it shouldn't. I'm not even completely
At 08:50 PM 4/28/2001 +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:19PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:28 AM 4/28/2001 -0400, Joe Brown wrote:
Having said that,
1. is there a good reason OCI shouldn't free the resource reguardless
of the
reference count
At 02:42 PM 4/28/2001 -0400, Sean R. Bright wrote:
What was the thinking behind this bit of code from dirname()
(ext/standard/string.c:799):
PHPAPI void php_dirname(char *path, int len)
{
...
/* Strip trailing slashes */ --- This?
while (end = path IS_SLASH(*end)) {
: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:22:37 -0500
To: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jacob Steinberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-INST] AIX
Looks like that fixed everything. Now I'm just dealing with user/pass
issues so at least its making it to the SQL DB. Simple enough things
Yeah but doesn't this function use sendmail with is suid root?
Andi
At 08:13 AM 4/27/2001 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 10343
User Update by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: Mail related
Description: Mail function does not work ...
OK, I've found it !
Like i say in the previous
At 12:34 PM 4/27/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Larry,
You are right if this code refers to the POSIX semantics of readdir_r.
However, this code is in #if defined(HAVE_OLD_READDIR_R) and I don't know
what is meant by old readdir_r (different
At 01:10 PM 4/27/2001 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
On 2001-04-27 11:27:55, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:03 AM 4/27/2001 -0400, David Croft wrote:
Thank you Andi and Andrei.
I have noticed that object method callbacks are consistently faster
than
global function callbacks
Did you compile with debug on or off?
Please try without debug in both PHP and your module and let us know if
something changes.
Also can you try and load it via php.ini (extension=module.so) and not with
dl().
Andi
At 01:41 PM 4/27/2001 -0500, Brian Foddy wrote:
I'm having strange problems
At 06:03 PM 4/27/2001 -0400, Joe Brown wrote:
Run into a spot of trouble using Metabase(db wrapper) because of it's use of
casting a $var=intval($resource) where OCIFreeCursor fails to function after
it has been casted.
Guessing that it fails because intval is creating a reference to the
At 12:03 AM 4/27/2001 -0400, David Croft wrote:
Thank you Andi and Andrei.
I have noticed that object method callbacks are consistently faster than
global function callbacks, and was wondering why:
1.3135770559311 seconds for 10 runs - with no function callback
6.9758139848709 seconds for
Larry,
You are right if this code refers to the POSIX semantics of readdir_r.
However, this code is in #if defined(HAVE_OLD_READDIR_R) and I don't know
what is meant by old readdir_r (different semantics?).
Sascha? Can you shed some light on this?
Andi
At 06:23 AM 4/27/2001 +, [EMAIL
At 09:41 PM 4/26/2001 +0200, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
This is a question for the php-dev people too.
What are the other hidden features not documented
like this?
Check the code. This is simply a legacy feature there only for backward
compatibility and should not be documented as we
At 12:11 AM 4/26/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote:
I'll agree that the inverse of the above is true ;)))
But if you look at it over time, it averages out, making the net
effect equal 0.
anyway, I think we agree on the math, we just disagree on whether the
short term affect is worth it.
At 12:51 PM 4/26/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
At 09:41 PM 4/26/2001 +0200, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
This is a question for the php-dev people too.
What are the other hidden features not documented
like this?
Check the code. This is simply a legacy feature there only for
In PHP/FI 2 functions weren't written like in PHP 3 4. Their style was
something like:
function foo $a $b
(
)
We added the more C-like functions and called it cfunction. Then we decided
that should be the default so function became old_function and cfunction
became function.
Andi
At 11:16
Has this happened to anyone else on AIX?
Maybe the MySQL configure isn't doing something right. It should set a
#define called HAVE_INT_8_16_32 but I don't seem to find a reference to it
in any .m4.
Andi
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:22:14 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jacob Steinberger
At 01:05 AM 4/25/2001 -0500, J. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:56:47AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I commited another fix.
is_link() should work correctly now. If things have improved and you have
problems with lstat() and filetype() (which I think there's a good chance
At 01:19 AM 4/25/2001 -0500, J. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:05:00AM -0500, J. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:56:47AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I commited another fix.
is_link() should work correctly now. If things have improved and you
have
problems with lstat
At 06:14 PM 4/25/2001 +0200, Jascha Wetzel wrote:
Greetings,
i just implementet php_xalan and it kind of works but we're still having
problems combining it with php-4.0.4pl1.
Strange things happen when php uses libxalan and libxerces. After everything
worked fine, the xslt sheet has been
At 03:59 PM 4/24/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
A reproducible crash bug in a mainstream module is a show stopper IMHO...
I think you mean in a mainstream module and in a situation which has a high
chance of happening.
Crash bugs which are 1 in a million don't necessarily need to be show
in a situation which is very likely to
happen.
Zeev
At 17:09 24/4/2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:59 PM 4/24/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
A reproducible crash bug in a mainstream module is a show stopper IMHO...
I think you mean in a mainstream module and in a situation which has a
high chance
Did this work in the past? If so, any idea when it stopped working?
Andi
At 10:13 AM 4/24/2001 -0400, Matt White wrote:
Hello...
I'm banging around on PHP 4.0.5 RC7 Win32 (Apache module), and I'm having
great difficultly getting the TRANS_SID feature to work. I have one web
application which
At 02:24 AM 4/25/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
While I'd say Jani's letter was slightly over emotional ;), he does have a
point.
I think that taking a stop to look closely at the bugs database would be a
good thing, and the turn of a new version is a good time to do
it. Deciding 4.0.6 won't
think filetype()
might also not work correctly on links which aren't pointing to anything
(at least not give all the right information).
Andi
At 04:51 PM 4/24/2001 -0500, J. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:50:36AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
It definitely seems as if the logic
At 10:35 PM 4/24/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
At 02:24 AM 4/25/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
While I'd say Jani's letter was slightly over emotional ;), he does have a
point.
I think that taking a stop to look closely at the bugs database would be a
good thing, and the turn of a
at 07:22:03AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
I just commited a patch which also cleaned up some other stuff
(although it
could still use some fixing up).
Please check the latest CVS to see if it works now.
Also can you please check the lstat() command? I think it has the same
problem (I
The readlink() function? You mean the is_link() function no?
The readlink() function is something completely different.
Can you also try those other two functions? lstat() and filetype()?
Andi
At 12:48 AM 4/25/2001 -0500, J. Jones wrote:
Oh.. the readlink () function works fine in both
At 11:04 PM 4/24/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Having a better defined/reproduced list of bugs is a must and if the QA
team can do that PHP will definitely benefit from it. However, today when
they ask people to fix bugs they are often not fixed and I don't even think
that they are
At 09:59 AM 4/23/2001 -0700, Frank M. Kromann wrote:
These have to be defined on Win32 as well. In order to compile I can just
put some default definitions in config.w32.h.
I'm getting another error though:
D:\php\php4\main\php_ini.c(190) : error C2065: 'llist_dtor_func_t' :
undeclared
At 02:59 PM 4/20/2001 -0700, Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
Hello Zeev,
neljapev, 19.04.2001, you wrote:
ZS I rolled RC7 - if there are no surprises (there'd better not be! :), it
ZS can finally go out early next week.
ZS Zeev
Where i can get it ?
At 08:03 AM 4/19/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
[Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 06:53 PM 4/18/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
*BLAM*
That's the sound of someone shooting himself in the foot. The PEAR
installer needs the XML extension. :-)
What do you mean? Has
At 08:13 AM 4/19/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
[Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Right but if we chose XML this makes it much harder to have C clients
(even Perl because the module might not be installed). I don't think
Over my dead body. Take a look at all
At 03:33 AM 4/19/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Guys,
Over the years, there's always been a tendency to think about things which
are 10 steps ahead. It never worked, and I don't think it would work here
either. Moreover, I don't see any advantage in discussing this now - on
the contrary -
Well I have been abroad and been reading Emails very slowly via
international calls so I might have missed a few (no need for the sarcasm).
What I describe is the situation I would like to see. I will try and catch
up will the zillions of Email I have and see why this can't be achieved.
Andi
At 01:40 AM 4/12/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
["Brian Foddy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've been looking everywhere for a good reference of how to read and
update arrays. The Zend documentation
(www.zend.com/apidoc) has descriptions of how to create
an array, and how to add elements to
At 10:22 AM 4/5/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
sniperWed Apr 4 13:46:27 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/php4 php.ini-dist php.ini-optimized NEWS
/php4/ext/standardurl_scanner.c url_scanner_ex.re
Yes, what you're saying definitely makes sense and I think it should be fixed.
Andi
At 09:20 PM 4/5/2001 +0200, Carsten Gehling wrote:
One of the IMHO stranger behaviors in PHP is what happens to the
$HTTP_SESSION_VARS array when changing register_globals from off to on.
If register_globals is
By the time we close in on 2038 and UNIX is still around (*smile*) then
most UNIX systems will most probably have moved to 64bit timestamps, thus
requiring in the best place just a recompilation of your PHP binary and in
the worse case if you saved binary file stamps to a file, some kind of
OK guys,
I feel VERY uncomfortable releasing 4.0.5 with this arg_separators problem.
Let's brainstorm and try to think of a nice, clean and constructive way of
solving this problem. Let's try to ditch the "screw the user because he
didn't read RFC foo.bar approach :)
The issue is with the
At 05:40 PM 4/4/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I feel VERY uncomfortable releasing 4.0.5 with this arg_separators problem.
Let's brainstorm and try to think of a nice, clean and constructive way of
solving this problem. Let's try to ditch the "
At 07:11 PM 4/4/2001 +0200, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
But commercial companies aside, the plethora of configuration options
(like
magic_quotes_gpc) can and does make life harder for people writing code
libraries (like PEAR) that are meant to be dropped in anywhere, or for
people
trying to
This was fixed to be consistent with ?.
One line comments end at a new line or at a closing bracket (? or %)
Andi
At 05:54 PM 4/4/2001 -0700, Steven Roussey wrote:
Hi,
I found our problem. In 4.0.5, comments seem to be parsed differently. We
have ASP style tags enabled so we can use % as well
Anyone have an idea why this happens?
Andi
At 05:37 PM 4/3/2001 +0200, Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
Hello php-qa,
test.php
?
echo $test;
?
http://host/test.php?test=1;2;3
4.0.4pl1
Result: 1;2;3
4.0.5RC6
Result: 1
Best regards,
Andrew Sitnikov
e-mail : [EMAIL
'' and ';' are valid
delimiters in a URL, so the new 4.0.5 behaviour is actually the valid one, I
believe. Refer to the XHTML specification, or check out the bugs db for
this.
Anil
- Original Message -
From: "Andi Gutmans" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Andrew Sitnikov" [EMAIL PROTECTE
:21 3/4/2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Anyone have an idea why this happens?
Andi
At 05:37 PM 4/3/2001 +0200, Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
Hello php-qa,
test.php
?
echo $test;
?
http://host/test.php?test=1;2;3
4.0.4pl1
Result: 1;2;3
4.0.5RC6
Result: 1
James,
You have to be aware that now PHP has such a big user base we need to be
very careful in the changes we make especially when we can be pretty
certain that it might burn quite a lot of people. We can break
compatibility more easily when we have a major release (as from PHP 3 to
PHP 4)
At 09:52 PM 4/3/2001 +0100, James Moore wrote:
Well, I dont think any of us really know how much damage it will cause. But
on the other hand we can do this for years and just say well we mustn't
break backwards compatibility and we will end up with somthing looking and
behaving like perl. When we
At 02:46 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote:
Just wanted to toss in my .02 here...
Anyone who wrote scripts in the past expecting: foo.php?a=1;2;3 to get
"$a=1;2;3" was relying on a bug, or at the very LEAST an undocumented
feature. So if it goes away, it goes away. It should never have worked
At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote:
Speaking of this, I think we need to collect all of these types of
issues that are waiting for a "4.1" release somewhere, so we can get a
clear idea of when 4.1 is appropriate. Anyone know of any off-hand? If
not, I can go search the archives...
In
Andrei,
Can you please merge this to 4.0.5. I think it should be in and we better
release a final RC6.
I think it's better to have another quick RC (I can roll it today or
tomorrow) before we get 4.0.5 out of the door.
Andi
At 08:25 AM 4/2/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr
Thanks!
Does anyone else have any critical bug fixes which need to be in 4.0.5? (I
mean critical ones and not huge patches).
Andi
At 11:17 AM 4/2/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
It's done.
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Andrei,
Can you please merge this to 4.0.5. I think
Maybe Dave will volunteer to implement this for 4.0.6 :)
Andi
At 10:42 AM 4/2/2001 +0200, Alexander Feldman wrote:
Do most servers and OS's (for example Windows) support the sending of a
UDP
package to the echo port?
Andi
Yeah,
What about a new ICMP extension - ping, traceroute,
At 05:37 PM 4/2/2001 +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Does anyone else have any critical bug fixes
which need to be in 4.0.5? (I mean critical ones and not
huge patches).
Zeev's output buffering fix hasn't been committed yet; it's a one-line
change, and it makes
At 03:18 PM 4/2/2001 +0100, James Moore wrote:
1. The function array_flip($array) puts one extra zero byte at
the end of
each element in the return array thus making the result non binary safe.
I've just fixed it in CVS.
How critical is this? does it need to also be in 4.0.5 (sorry
You can get RC6 at http://cvs.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.5RC6.tar.gz (no time to
commit to phpweb cvs and wait for it to update, if someone has time then
even better, I need some sleep :)
In case you're testing it within the next few hours you might need to
"touch *" the files in the php4/
I very much liked Andrei's implementation of Smary templates. It uses the
Zend (PHP) scripting language and caches templated scripts without messing
with the core of PHP.
I haven't used it but from reading the specs it looks like Andrei his
guys did a great job.
Andi
At 11:10 AM 4/1/2001
Do most servers and OS's (for example Windows) support the sending of a UDP
package to the echo port?
Andi
At 12:39 AM 4/2/2001 -0400, Dave Crawford wrote:
Before I ask for a PING function in a future build of PHP, is there a
way to ping a remote host using the existing PHP functions or
Why do you need to rely on such behavior? Are you trying to do something
naught? :)
I think in general it's not a good idea to rely on the value and type of
resources (even though this is an integer).
I'm not quite sure why it returns integers and not resources. Looks like a
bad thing to me as
but in
the least it should be fixed not to leak fd's even if you go with the
integer fix implementation. But it is not very PHP to do that. You already
have an fd resource as far as I know in ext/standard so you can use that.
Andi
At 02:02 AM 3/29/2001 -0800, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
Andi
At 03:35 PM 3/29/2001 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Note that the situation isn't as bad as you thought - it's not that it's
not using the resource mechanism. It is, if it wasn't, we'd be getting
loads of complaints from people running out of descriptors very
quickly. It just uses old, PHP 3
, the error_reporting() pl1 in 4.0.1 was due to a bug which was
in the CVS a long time. It was not a spontaneous bug that was introduced.
Andi
At 07:50 PM 3/21/2001 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
A couple of these were buffer overflows IIRC which were security
At 08:32 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
andi Tue Mar 20 10:13:21 2001 EDT
Added files: (Branch: PHP_4_0_5)
/php4/sapi/fastcgiCREDITS Makefile.in README.FastCGI config.m4
At 07:41 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:32 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
andi Tue Mar 20 10:13:21 2001 EDT
Added files: (Branch: PHP_4_0_5
At 07:57 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I couldn't find any indication that this can break any of the other sapi
builds so I don't think there's a problem with adding it.
Okay. But still I find it very annoying that we don't follow the
rules
Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 19 March, 2001 7-04 aM
To: Phil Driscoll
Cc: Chris Newbill; Andi Gutmans; PHP DEV
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] feature request
Phil is right. The only thing that may be both useful and
practical would
be isset() on multiple variables
Newbill; Andi Gutmans; PHP DEV
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] feature request
Phil is right. The only thing that may be both useful and
practical would
be isset() on multiple variables, returning either true or false.
Zeev
At 11:31 19/3/2001, Phil Driscoll wrote:
$a = 1;
$b = 2
At 07:58 PM 3/19/2001 +, Phil Driscoll wrote:
My earlier post to the list doesn't seem to have arrived yet, so here it is
again. You'll note from the posting that I'm not keen on the patch staying
in. There are considerable efforts being made by several of us on the QA
team trying to make the
to handle
multi args,
we could offer things in the new function such as an optional argument
that passes back an array of results.
-Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Driscoll" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Chris Newbill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Zeev Suraski"
[EMAIL PRO
I think it makes sense to have empty() behave the same as isset() (they are
brother functions).
empty($a, $b, $c) would return 0 if non are empty and 1 if one of those
variables is empty.
Andi
At 12:22 AM 3/20/2001 -0500, Jon Parise wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:35:31PM +0200, Zeev
I'm not too familiar with Tuxedo but the first step would be for you to
actually write a PHP module which interfaces with Tuxedo. Once you're done
with it/tested it and you feel it's worth putting into PHP we can open you
a CVS account.
I don't think there are many people who will need this
It should be possible to do this. I'll look into it. But I also need to
think about how much sense it makes :)
Today you're asking for isset(...,...,...). Tomorrow you will ask to know
which one was not set if it failed.
So I hope what youreally want is only the first.
Andi
At 09:42 PM
At 04:03 PM 3/13/2001 -0800, Lon Baker wrote:
The source compiles and installs as a DSO under:
Mac OS X 10.0 RC1
Apache 1.3.19
MySQL 3.23.34a
Config line used: ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs
--enable-track-vars --with-mysql=/usr/local/mysql --with-zlib
With the following issues:
This is extremely reproducible. Definitely a show stopper until Zeev fixes
this one.
Andi
At 01:38 AM 3/14/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
Hi Zeev,
chunked output buffering seems to work on Linux. Unfortunately several
things do not work (anymore) on win32 (tested CGI):
1)
Using
Any idea what the problem could be? I doubt Mac OS X uses \r\n.
Andi
From: Lon Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Zeev Suraski" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5RC1
The source compiles and installs as a DSO under:
Mac OS X
I tried the following (command line):
?
$foobar-rfoo=$a;
$foobar-r2foo=$foobar-rfoo;
$foobar-rfoo=4;
print $a;
and it didn't crash.
Are you sure this reproduces a crash for you? On which platform? And any
other information you can give us.
Andi
At 03:27 AM 3/15/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst
I commited a patch but didn't test it.
Andrei, please make sure I don't have some dumb bug there.
Andi
At 10:12 AM 3/12/2001 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
strlcpy, and strlcat are in the win32 build (main/strlcat.c main/strlcpy.c)
why dont you malloc a buffer that would fit the sprintf data, and
Because snprintf() sucks and what we did is faster :)
Andi
At 09:25 AM 3/12/2001 -0800, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Why not add a:
#define snprintf _snprintf
to the zend_config.w32.h file? That should take care of the mentioned
compile problem under windows.
- Original Message -
From:
If it's not an alias I think you probably want PHP_FE(member_function,
NULL) and use PHP_FUNCTION(member_function) in the function decleration.
Andi
At 12:06 PM 3/12/2001 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the standard is for the builtin_functions
function_entry in OO,
should
At 08:49 PM 3/10/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
When you say that people shouldn't use references because of performance
what do you mean? I think you are right in general but when you are
passing around objects you should use references. for example:
function foo($obj)
{
}
foo($myobject);
I'm not quite sure if it is related but in general popen() doesn't work on
non-console PHP under windows. I think your CGI is running without a
console and the same happens with ISAPI.
Someone is working on fixing this Windows issue but no results yet.
Andi
At 07:20 AM 3/9/2001 +0100, Andr
Yeah, it's supposed to be this way. We copied C++.
Andi
At 10:50 AM 3/9/2001 -0600, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Just ran into something (well, actually searching for it) and wanted to
know what everyone's thoughts on this were and whether it should stay
that way.
?php
class Foo {
function
00, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
We need to think of static class variables. I don't think it's very
easy to
do this in a way which wouldn't cause a general performance loss but I'll
put on my thinking cap.
Ok, I was gonna try to hack it in mysel
At 12:56 AM 3/10/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
Hi,
1) I am currently completing the php documentation to cover all
undocumented features and I have noticed that using a static method call
to the same class from on instanciated object exhibits the presence of the
instance within the static
At 01:30 AM 3/10/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
There are no static functions in PHP. This syntax is used to call a
method of the parent. It can be used to call other methods and thus have
parent::foo();
If you remember, it has been implemented *after*
[classname]::[functionname]() ...
I
At 02:20 PM 3/8/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 22:33 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Why not bzip2_?
*** Well, if bzip2_, then gzip_ !
If gz_ then bz_ or bz2_.
Am I wrong or too fastidious ?
No, because gz_ has existed for a long time. If we'd give it a name today
we'd probably
At 11:07 AM 3/7/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 23:48 06/03/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote:
[snip]
Yep. Let's start doing some damage. bzip2 is a very good victim.
bzclose - bz_close
bzcompress - bz_compress
bzdecompress - bz_decompress
bzerrno - bz_errno
bzerror
At 04:34 PM 3/7/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 17:22 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
*** What is the difference between error ad errstr ?
Maybe errstr should be changed to errmsg ? (Did I say that elsewhere ? ;-)
As the file extension is .bz2, maybe the prefix should be bz2_
At 10:20 AM 3/7/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote:
At 04:34 PM 3/7/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 17:22 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
*** What is the difference between error ad errstr ?
bzerror returns an array containing the error string and error number
801 - 900 of 939 matches
Mail list logo
