Same here. I didn't change anything for Windows (except moving the
file), since I haven't got a Windows dev system. The implementation
could certainly be improved, that would be much easier for me to do
by also using it for UNIX. While I do agree to some extent with
Rasmus, the changes
sure many people do not have an smtpd
listening on localhost:25 while most people have an MTA capable of
spooling or delivering a message.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It is valid in the sense that the code would not be executed the second
time, but it isn't valid for preventing multiple function definitions
inside that block. ie. no conditional function definitions.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Since you can no longer do
Function test()\n;
}
}
?
Doesn't work in my 4.1 here. I get redefined function errors.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL
file ee:
?
if(!defined(_FOO_INC)):
define('_FOO_INC',1);
function foo() {
echo Hello World\n;
}
endif;
?
file ee1:
?
include 'ee';
include 'ee';
foo();
?
10:11am rasmus:~ php ee1
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.0.8-dev
Content-type: text/html
br
';
include 'ee';
foo();
?
10:11am rasmus:~ php ee1
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.0.8-dev
Content-type: text/html
br /
bFatal error/b: Cannot redeclare foo() (previously declared in
/usr/local/home/rasmus/ee:5) in b/usr/local/home/rasmus/ee/b on line
b4/bbr /
/usr/local/home/rasmus/ee
Don't you think that on some systems (probably with high loads) it might be
much more efficient to use SMTP than spanning mail via fork()/exec()?
Only in the case of a local smtpd. But yes, in that scenario I agree.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net
this?
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, pNext = 0x827b4e0, pLast = 0x0, size = 20,
persistent = 0, cached = 0}
That mem_header looks a bit messed up. I could of course be stepping on
memory elsewhere. Anybody else seeing this?
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
An update to this. It only happens if an extension is dl()'ed. If it is
loaded via an extension= in php.ini it works fine.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
The leak notices and other --enable-debug messages seem to be brokwn right
now.
ie.
stick a stray char *s
compiler flag.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
php_admin_value disable_functions does not work. Works fine from php.ini.
I am swamped with other stuff, but could someone familiar with that bit of
code take a look? Are we processing httpd.conf stuff after whatever point
disable_functions are applied?
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development
At 07:55 24-10-01, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
php_admin_value disable_functions does not work. Works fine from php.ini.
It's not supposed to work, it can only work from php.ini.
Why?
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
At 09:30 24-10-01, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
At 07:55 24-10-01, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
php_admin_value disable_functions does not work. Works fine from php.ini.
It's not supposed to work, it can only work from php.ini.
Why?
Look at the code... It's really designed to be a one-time
PS: Can anyone explain why cvs does not update Zend, ZendEngine2 and
TSRM, when invoked inside the php4/ directory? I have the afore-
mentioned directories inside the php/ directory. This works fine
on Windows, but not on Linux, as I learned today :-/
cvs upd -dP
-Rasmus
XHTML without forcing people to use
?php ...? everywhere.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have to write code like:
if($a gt; $b) {
$bgt;gt;1;
}
Just for the record, I am not against ?php=, but I am very much against
removing the short tags.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
is
already working on it. thanks!
Prepared statements isn't something you implement in a scripting language.
It is something that needs to be implemented in the SQL server itself.
What exactly would you be preparing in PHP space?
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net
];
}
return $sql;
}
$sql = update user_list set first_name = ? where id = ?;
echo execute($sql,'andrew',1);
Try running that little 60-second hack job. Seems to do most of what you
just described. Put another 10 minutes of work into it and you are there.
-Rasmus
for example
This look ok to me. Don't forget to update the docs though.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Rui Hirokawa wrote:
I am also using Mozilla.
I hope this patch is acceptable for CVS tree.
Can I commit this patch ?
Deleting 'Expires' header from 'private' mode is another option,
but, it may
This doesn't look like the right fix to me. There is no such thing as
a php_unserialize_data_t typedef as far as I can tell.
-Rasmus
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Markus Fischer wrote:
Here's the fix. Someone with proper karma please apply it.
- Markus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http
Ah, didn't have an updated tree.
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Markus Fischer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 03:56:45AM +0100, Markus Fischer wrote :
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 06:44:36PM -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote :
This doesn't look like the right fix to me. There is no such thing
check. Thus I don't see why the
correct result here should be not executable. A simple command-line
example:
% chmod 0644 test.file
% ls -la test.file
-rw-r--r--1 rasmus rasmus 46 Nov 11 07:26 test.file
% ./test.file
./test.file: Permission denied.
% chmod 0654 test.file
% ls -la
about on Oct.24 related
to bug #13806? You said it was only reproducable in the branch but fine
in HEAD at the time.
-Rasmus
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Guys,
We have a bit of a dilemma here. As you all know, the 4.0.7 branch, on
which 4.1.0 is currently scheduled
This code has changed significantly in current CVS. 4.0.6 and 4.1.0RC1
should not have the problem.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Linux 2.2.20 and 2.4.14
PHP version: 4.0CVS-2001
Well, file uploads do work in general in PHP 4.0.6 or the whole world
would be screaming. So there is something specific to your test case or
your system that is causing this.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Hans Rakers wrote:
As i reported in my bug report, i can reproduce this problem
, file uploads do work in general in PHP 4.0.6 or the whole world
would be screaming. So there is something specific to your test case
or your system that is causing this.
-Rasmus
As i reported in my bug report, i can reproduce this problem with 4.0.6
and current cvs.
Hans
Well, do you have access to another machine? I bet the exact same script
will work ok on another machine. _IO_new_* related crashes tend to be
related to messed up glibc/ld issues and do not necessarily mean that
there is anything wrong with PHP.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Hans Rakers
on the negative boundary.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These definitely do not hide any sort of bug. They are simply scaling an
image and the result needs to be an int as you can't have fractional
pixels. So this data-loss is intentional.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
gd.c
C:\home\php\php4\ext\gd\gd.c(3537
Yes, I know the pow() test is still failing. Need to go sort out a visa
issue this morning but will try to figure out if it is worth fixing in the
code or if we should just munge the test.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Zak Greant wrote:
On November 13, 2001 06:13 am, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote
A good place to start is README.EXT_SKEL in the PHP distribution.
-Rasmus
On 14 Nov 2001, Charles VIARD wrote:
hello,
I want to make a PHP module, but i didn't find any doc on how
to do it!
Especially PHP type, code return and structure of a module.
can somebody help me?
thanx
at all:
?php=$a?
compare with:
?$php=$a?
or:
?php $php=$a?
?=$a? is maginally better because at least there is nothing to the left
of the = sign to visually confuse matters.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
this just the other day in HEAD?
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see a check for this function in ext/gd/config.m4, but I see no sign of
it in any version of GD I can find. Someone clue me in please.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
is in
gdft.c to do this, but for some reason it isn't working. I think I am
close to understanding what is happening, but I wonder if someone else has
tracked this one down yet?
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
rasmus required ?
Most of the issues are fixed in GD-2.0.2. We just need Boutell to get off
their butts and release a new version now.
-Rasmus
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Marco Kaiser wrote:
Hi,
i played a little with the stupid gd-2.xxx and 1.8.4 so maybe i find a
way to fix one of
rasmus
with something as simple as money, do not use floating
point at all. Just multiply everything by 100 and deal only with
integers. That solves all your problems without any performance hit.
There is nothing to fix here.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to xslt_process()
needs to be $xsl_handle in your case. The warning you are seeing is
correct.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL
At 09:10 7-12-2001 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
the following code causes Apache processes to segfault:
$xsl_handle = xslt_create();
echo $xsl_handle; // returns a valid xslt processor handle
// $xslData and $xmlData contain valid information
, as a programmer, will have to add the appropriate fuzz factor when
using functions such as floor(), ceil() and round().
-Rasmus
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, George Whiffen wrote:
Pierre/Rasmus/Zeev,
After a little more thought, it seems to me that, my problem, Bug 6220 and Matthew's
original
problem
Most people never mix XML and PHP in the same file. Let's not
inconvenience the masses for the benefit of the few.
-Rasmus
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Yet another good reason to get rid of them. :)
--Jani
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
No, you need
Guys, relax. No, this does not work. The only reason your example works
is because min() is a built-in PHP function already.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Joao Prado Maia wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, benjamin yates wrote:
a way to create the same as a #define macro... man would
of macros in a language like C is
that they are processed before compilation and a real function call is
avoided. This does not apply to a non-compiled language like PHP so there
is no reason not to simply create a PHP-level function if you want
something like that.
-Rasmus
--
PHP
http://conf.php.net/lwce2 start at slide 33
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Shane Wright wrote:
Hi
I've looked all over the place (php.net, zend.com, phpbuilder.com, archive
for the lists, everywhere..) and I cant find anywhere a nice intro to
building PHP extensions.
I just need something to
No, you need to disable short_tags and use ?php ... ? for all your PHP
tags if you are going to mix PHP and XML tags in the same file.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Steve Haemelinck wrote:
Hi Guys
I am developing with PHP and XML. Now I experience some problem with the
processing
Nope, there are no plans to change the names of the base functions in PHP.
-Rasmus
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Jonas Delfs wrote:
Hi -
I've read somewhere that PHP4.1.0 (or was it PHP5?) finally will provide
some more logic functions names depending on librarys. Something like
file_open
return FALSE on error ...
(like arsort() does!)
Am I wrong?
Hrm.. There is no way to return VOID from a PHP function.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list
. Especially since fopen() is not in a library at all. There
is no file library.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/round for me? That's my question.
Because that would impose rounding errors and remove the develpor's
flexibility for controlling this exactly.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
compressed data--length error
-Rasmus
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, [iso-8859-1] Mårten Gustafsson wrote:
Ok, sorry :)
Since it was available from www.php.net I thought was time.
Btw, the tarball seems to be corrupt:
snip
nightlife@ns:~/src$ gunzip -c php-4.1.0.tar.gz | tar xf -
tar: Skipping
Some minor changes to get ming to work with PHP 4.1. The first one is not
4.1 specific. That library check needs to be compiled against -lm in
order to work, at least on my Linux box. I don't think adding -lm will
hurt anywhere else either. The second one is a PHP API change described
in
as the first arg.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Jonas Delfs wrote:
10-12-2001 18:42 you wrote:
Nope, there are no plans to change the names of the base functions
in
PHP.
I'm a little new to this list so just say if you have discussed this
in
the latest past, but wouldn't
Users can update bug reports just fine if they bother to remember the
passwords they set
On 15 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 14531
Updated by: yohgaki
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: Session related
Operating System: Linux
PHP Version: 4.1.0
New Comment:
the mailing list to discuss the bug happens to be.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Jaime Bozza wrote:
Unfortunately, the original bug (14496) wasn't written by the person
submitting the additional information.
It's kind of difficult to remember a password you never had. :)
There's
scripts and 2) encouraging people to avoid namespace clashes just by
changing case. Someone said they wanted to use If() for example. Imaging
debugging code like that? No thanks.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I have said this all the time..as well as many others.
Try
to create both using only one configure/compile?
Not currently, no.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is part of PEAR).
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bad reasons to be separate:
1) takes twice as much memory
That's not true due to the shallow copy/copy-on-write nature of things.
If you change every element of one array, then yes, at this point you will
be taking up twice the memory.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http
Well, I don't see it in the DB. Please fill out the form again.
-Rasmus
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ilia A. wrote:
I've sent one on Jan. 2, 2002 it appeared on the php-dev list.
Here is the copy of the message, just in case.
[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: iliaa
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:15:46
but we are still not quite there with it in terms of
being a production-quality environment.
-Rasmus
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Daniel Lorch wrote:
Hi,
I'm administrating a server with many virtual hosts. To get rid of some
security holes i enabled safe_mode. But after that php scripts weren't
ugly.
-Rasmus
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Philip Olson wrote:
Many ask How do I use superglobals yet allow my scripts to work on older
versions of PHP, is there an official documentable response to this?
Regards,
Philip Olson
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe
I have looked at mod_become before, but I really don't see any advantage
to it over CGI as it kills off the httpd process after any request. If
each httpd only handles one request, how is it an improvement on cgi?
Or have I misunderstood how mod_become works?
-Rasmus
There is also mod_become
At http://www.snert.com/Software/mod_become/index.shtml that it kills it
off after each request. So I guess that was a local change.
I still don't know about running my httpd as root though. That would
worry me quite a bit.
-Rasmus
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13
,
rasmus, but some of the developers) recommend using mod_php for
virtual hosting. The only thing I'm talking about is:
mod_php (+ safe_mode) != virtual hosting
it should be
php cgi (+ safe_mode) == virtual hosting
and
mod_php == own, private box. performance boost.
But what I am saying
It took me about 3 clicks to find the right page on www.zend.com that
tells you how to report bugs.
http://www.zend.com/store/products/optimizer-troubleshooting.php
I figured pointing you at the web site was enough and you could manage
that.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Hans Rakers wrote
You call it broken, we call it finally making them POSIX-compliant.
Whatever floats your boat.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
Alain Samoun wrote:
Manuel:
What is broken with strtok() since php4.06? So far my code that use it seems
to work ok with PHP4.10
to
change this functionality. There is no conspiracy here. Nothing to see
here, return to your homes...
And please stop cross-posting to multiple PHP lists.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
I think php.net/ini going to the right place would be good. So I guess
ini would be my suggestion.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Hi!
We just noticed a major problem in the docs, and so we
would like to invent a new name for php.ini settings.
Now look at
http
Just like that
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Eduardo Melo wrote:
Please,
How can i use a similar command of C language as such as if (a==b b==c) ?
anyone can help ?
thanks,
eduardo melo
computer programmer
_
MSN Photos is the
. ($_ENV also?)
How about make variable_order affects only for globals?
Well, you still need to resolve precedence for $_REQUEST somehow.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Personally, I prefer register_globals=Off for session,
but no objection here also.
'S' is Server not Session variables. Big difference.
There is currently no real way to control session vars via
variables_order.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe
. For
example, if you have installed the GD library in /opt/gd which means
that /opt/gd/include has your GD header files and /opt/gd/lib contains
your GD library files, you would use --with-gd=/opt/gd
-Rasmus
Can anyone let me know if this is expected behaviour?
i've built gd
type: locate gd.h
You will see that you have more than one. Get rid of all the wrong ones
and the other associated gd header files so you only have one version
installed and start over.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, James Cox wrote:
Ok,
so maybe i'm the idiot, but can you help me make some
issue.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Sander Roobol wrote:
[PROBLEM]
Sessions can easily be taken over by other, malicious users. All you
need is the session-id and you're done.
User who have read-access to the directory where PHP stores it's
session-data, can read the ids directly from
Looks ok to me.
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, James E. Flemer wrote:
Hello ... It's been a while since I've actively been
committing to PHP. So I thought I'd run this by everyone
first.
This is a patch to change the behavior of the PHP.INI
directive safe_mode_include_dir (which I added about 6
flexible enough for advanced users. This fits that rule.
Give the advanced users the tools to configure PHP to have per-virtualhost
session handling, while sessions still work for the guy who just installed
PHP on his own little server and really doesn't know what he is doing.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 1 Feb
should be clueful
enough to configure things themselves or they probably shouldn't be in the
business.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail
to thousands of insecure PHP installations on production
machines.
Why would you switch on safe_mode if you have a dedicated server? That
makes no sense. There is also nothing unsafe about the session code if
you are on a dedicated server.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net
someone woulod have had to do to learn of this vulnerability would
have been to go to any of the PHP talks I have given in the past 3 years.
We will not scan queries to catch these. Safe mode is a crappy fix to a
problem that isn't ours.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
We
At 08:15 AM 2/5/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
The fact that 3rd party libs can load arbitrary files is not a new
concept. Every time I give a moderately detailed PHP talk I mention the
fact that there is a way to load a file through the oci8 libs. Of course
it can be done through the mysql
I completely agree with Dan on these points. If you don't want to see
certain types of posts, or posts from certain people, you are a simple
procmail rule away from getting rid of them. Making php-dev a closed list
is a horrible idea.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote
any problem putting this in.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Lukas Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 08:13:42AM +0100, Markus Fischer wrote:
Patches should always be against latest CVS.
here it is. against latest
Is there any support for tcl with php?
Nope
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Are there plans to have tcl support for php?
None whatsoever
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
. The {1,3} subscripting
idea has been discussed at length. Go check the archives.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Done
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, l0t3k wrote:
could someone with karma please move the CRC32 macro and crc table to a
header so it can be generally accessible to modules ?
id hate to duplicate it.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
No, you pretty much need the command line version of PHP to run those
tests the way the framework is written. I suppose it could be modified to
run through the module, but you'd have to fiddle with it a little bit.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Venkat Raghavan wrote:
Hi. We're involved
that.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Venkat Raghavan wrote:
Again, it's we folks porting PHP onto NetWare.
Is it necessary that the LDAP extension has to be a separate binary?
Can we build it into PHPLIB itself? If so, how do we enable LDAP,
considering we can't run the CONFIGURE script
);
}
Then you can simply do:
redirect(http://www.php.net;);
-Rasmus
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Sent to the Apache contact address. I told him I was forwarding
it, but that he might not get a reply if his message was considered
too rude.. :-)
- Forwarded
Unlikely unless you figure out how to fix it and submit a patch. Very few
developers have access to that combination to test things with.
-Rasmus
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Friday 22 February 2002 19:15, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
Argh...I *really* need both
I have set up dozens of production servers in the past couple of years and
not a single one of them is running the static version. If there are
issues with the DSO, then file a bug report on that so we can fix it.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote:
Jim wrote:
the fact
of the added overhead of
the bucket brigade implementation and other issues.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote:
#include as usual, all normal benchmark disclaimers.
This is -dev, so let's assume folks have a grasp of the gap between
performance benchmarking and the real world. Before
Which platform are you on?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote:
Hey Rasmus,
Well, I'd done a similar set of benchmarks between DSO and static with
apache 1.3.23, which showed the DSO variant getting around 1100 req/s.
So it wasn't an automatic assumption, I just noticed that the Apache 2
be worthwhile to have built-in.
-Brad
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Reversing htmlentities is trivial. I don't think it needs a special
function.
Simply do:
$trans = get_html_translation_table(HTML_ENTITIES);
$trans = array_flip($trans);
$data = strtr($data,$trans);
-Rasmus
such
precision errrors.
Anybody think we would have BC issues going from 14 to 10?
-Rasmus
On 27 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 15756
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Status: Open
+Status: Bogus
Bug Type
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
By the way, when was this 4.2.0 branch created? I saw no
php-dev/php-qa discussion on this.
Derick is writing the mail in question right now. We're currently
discussing the process on #php.bugs @ EFnet.
Well, you have the process upside down. You need to send
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Decisions like this are not made by one person on irc. Including the
decision on when to branch. This is done on php-dev. For all you know
there are people working on stuff for 4.2 that haven't committed just yet.
You're totally
Guys, I fixed this memchr()+1 issue a couple of days ago. See
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/main/rfc1867.c?r1=1.71.2.2r2=1.71.2.3ty=u
It's a crash-bug, not an exploitable buffer problem. If we need a 4.1.3
for some reason, it will be in there.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki
401 - 500 of 915 matches
Mail list logo
