That was quite a funny way of putting it (it did make me literally laugh
out loud a bit), but I have to agree :)
Either way, as Sterling pointed out and I pointed out a few days ago, this
+-N is really nothing but an 'I (strongly) (dis)agree', and it is in no way
a voting system. That's one
Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position to decide about
PHP'.
Zeev
At 02:35 19/12/2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On 18 Dec 2002,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position to decide about
PHP'.
There is nothing
At 14:14 19/12/2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I disagree. For instance, if I helped writing the combined module, and
someone separated it without thoroughly making sure that everyone is ok
with this separation, I believe it's upto him to be responsible to merge it
back in. What you suggest is
I disagree. For instance, if I helped writing the combined module, and
someone separated it without thoroughly making sure that everyone is ok
with this separation, I believe it's upto him to be responsible to merge it
back in.
That surely happens in 0.01% of the cases. My example
At 13:14 19.12.2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position
At 14:34 19/12/2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I disagree. For instance, if I helped writing the combined module, and
someone separated it without thoroughly making sure that everyone is ok
with this separation, I believe it's upto him to be responsible
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 01:51:01PM +0100, Marcus Brger wrote:
There is nothing funny about that statement. For example, if
you are not going to do the work on merging the CLI/CGI code,
just saying that you would like to see that happening has
little to no effect.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:26:52AM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Either way, as Sterling pointed out and I pointed out a few days ago, this
+-N is really nothing but an 'I (strongly) (dis)agree', and it is in no way
a voting system. That's one of the key reasons I try to avoid using it,
and
+1 on this.. :)
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position to decide about
PHP'.
At 01:35 19.12.2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On 18 Dec 2002, Xavier Spriet wrote:
Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to actually
make the decision.
That's the problem with the current state of PHP
Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to actually
make the decision.
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 18:43, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hey,
Just clarifying: We never agreed that -+[01] meant anything except a short
way of:
On 18 Dec 2002, Xavier Spriet wrote:
Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to actually
make the decision.
That's the problem with the current state of PHP development.
Too many people think that their
14 matches
Mail list logo
