At 07:52 18-11-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I don't think so. It is only a small extension to the functionality we
have already. If there would be more functionality to add during the
next release cycle i would agree to move this to a new extension.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 07:52 18-11-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I don't think so. It is only a small extension to the functionality we
have already. If there would be more functionality to add during the
next release
At 11:23 18.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 07:52 18-11-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I don't think so. It is only a small extension to the functionality we
have already. If there would be more
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Who can commit that now?
I don't think it's ready yet. I agree with Marcus that the name of the
function should be different then getanyrr(), it definitely doesn't fit
into the naming things we have (with that getmxrr() doesn't fit
I could do the autoconf stuff and i vould go for naming all
these function dns_get_xx() and such.
marcus
At 12:38 17.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Who can commit that now?
I don't think it's ready yet. I agree with Marcus that the
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I could do the autoconf stuff and i vould go for naming all
these function dns_get_xx() and such.
nice, but I dont think we need to introduce (about) 10 functions
which do basically the same thing except for returning a different
record. What I meant
Sure but anyway we would need to review the
config file if everything we need is in place.
marcus
At 14:54 17.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I could do the autoconf stuff and i vould go for naming all
these function dns_get_xx() and such.
nice, but
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
Sure but anyway we would need to review the
config file if everything we need is in place.
uhm, what config file?
Derick
At 14:54 17.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I could do the autoconf stuff and i
I guessed we'd have to look into ext/standard/config.m4
for that new functionality.
At 16:19 17.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
Sure but anyway we would need to review the
config file if everything we need is in place.
uhm, what config file?
Derick
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I guessed we'd have to look into ext/standard/config.m4
for that new functionality.
Ah, of course.
Derick
At 16:19 17.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
Sure but anyway we would need to review the
Wouldn't it make sense to move this to it's own
extension? It would make it easier to maintain and
keep the configure scripts readable.. :)
--Jani
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
Function is nice but the function name is not.
Attached is a second revised
I don't think so. It is only a small extension to the functionality we
have already. If there would be more functionality to add during the
next release cycle i would agree to move this to a new extension.
But let's here the others.
marcus
At 02:47 18.11.2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
I don't think so. It is only a small extension to the functionality we
have already. If there would be more functionality to add during the
next release cycle i would agree to move this to a new extension.
But let's here the others.
It's only 2
Per corrections suggested by [EMAIL PROTECTED], attached is a revised pacth to
ext/standard/dns.c for addition of getanyrr() function.
--- dns.c Sat Nov 16 13:31:51 2002
+++ dns.c Sat Nov 16 15:04:07 2002
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Function is nice but the function name is not.
Attached is a second revised patch that fixes the build problems.
marcus
At 00:11 17.11.2002, Pollita wrote:
Per corrections suggested by [EMAIL PROTECTED], attached is a revised pacth to
ext/standard/dns.c for addition of getanyrr() function.
--
Hello,
Who can commit that now?
Regards.
M.CHAILLAN Nicolas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.WorldAKT.com Hébergement de sites internets.
Marcus Börger [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit dans le message de
news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Function is nice but the function name is not.
Attached is a second revised
16 matches
Mail list logo
