Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI - etag support?

2003-03-10 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Ilia I was wondering if you thing we should have etag support as well as the last-modified header you added. if so .. we need to add ap_set_etag(r) just after the ap_set_last_modified(r) call. what do you guys think? Ilia --Ian -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsu

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-08 Thread Jean-Michel Dault
Le ven 07/03/2003 à 20:29, Ian Holsman a écrit : > I think it would be in everyone's best interest if apache2handler was > introduced in 4.3.X series & probably replace the current apache2filter all > together. > >>>I'm big +1 on this as it can be considered as a FIX.. > >>>Le

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-07 Thread Ian Holsman
Jean-Michel Dault wrote: Le ven 07/03/2003 à 02:56, Derick Rethans a écrit : I think it would be in everyone's best interest if apache2handler was introduced in 4.3.X series & probably replace the current apache2filter all together. I'm big +1 on this as it can be considered as a FIX.. Let

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-07 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Jean-Michel Dault wrote: > Le ven 07/03/2003 à 02:56, Derick Rethans a écrit : > > > >I think it would be in everyone's best interest if apache2handler was > > > >introduced in 4.3.X series & probably replace the current apache2filter all > > > >together. > > > I'm big +1

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-07 Thread Jean-Michel Dault
Le ven 07/03/2003 à 02:56, Derick Rethans a écrit : > > >I think it would be in everyone's best interest if apache2handler was > > >introduced in 4.3.X series & probably replace the current apache2filter all > > >together. > > I'm big +1 on this as it can be considered as a FIX.. > > Let'

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote: > >I think it would be in everyone's best interest if apache2handler was > >introduced in 4.3.X series & probably replace the current apache2filter all > >together. > > I'm big +1 on this as it can be considered as a FIX.. > Let's just replace th

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Ilia A. wrote: >On March 6, 2003 11:19 am, Derick Rethans wrote: >> Our policy is not to merge new things to stable branches (which is >> PHP_4_3 now). > >True, however the apache2handler works much better then the existing >apache2filter and as far as I can tell fixes at leas

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Ilia A.
On March 6, 2003 11:19 am, Derick Rethans wrote: > Our policy is not to merge new things to stable branches (which is > PHP_4_3 now). True, however the apache2handler works much better then the existing apache2filter and as far as I can tell fixes at least 1 crash bug. There maybe more things it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Peter Neuman
Hi, Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And make the configure option --with-apxs2.. :) Do you have an idea when --with-apache2 comes? thus which one can install the Apache2 also without DSO/CGI support? As with the Apache1 (--with-apache)... Thanks Peter Neuman -- PHP Development

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Ian Holsman wrote: >Jani Taskinen wrote: >| I think it would be okay to just replace the apache2filter >| with apache2handler altogether..since the former does not >| work as well anyway. >| >| Are there any differences how it is setup in http.conf btw? > >no..

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Ian Holsman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jani Taskinen wrote: | I think it would be okay to just replace the apache2filter | with apache2handler altogether..since the former does not | work as well anyway. | | Are there any differences how it is setup in http.conf btw? no.. not

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Jani Taskinen
I think it would be okay to just replace the apache2filter with apache2handler altogether..since the former does not work as well anyway. Are there any differences how it is setup in http.conf btw? --Jani On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Derick Rethans wrote: >On Thu, 6 M

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Sascha Schumann
> Sure, but there is no point in doing that... as there won't be released > from that branch anyway. Well, that depends on the needs of our users. Regardless, testing new SAPIs/extensions is quite a burden in the PHP 5 context, because you have two moving targets then -- the engin

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > > Can I check this into PHP_4 & PHP_4_3 ? > > > > Nope :) > > PHP_4 is ok. Sure, but there is no point in doing that... as there won't be released from that branch anyway. Derick -- Stop mad co

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Sascha Schumann
> > Can I check this into PHP_4 & PHP_4_3 ? > > Nope :) PHP_4 is ok. - Sascha -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Ian Holsman
Derick Rethans wrote: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Ian Holsman wrote: I've been using the apache2handler on two low/medium-traffic sites for a while and it appears ok to me. now.. I'm new to this list, and really don't know how it works, so excuse me if this is a FAQ or something. I'd like to see this

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Ian Holsman wrote: > I've been using the apache2handler on two low/medium-traffic sites for a > while and it appears ok to me. > > now.. I'm new to this list, and really don't know how it works, so > excuse me if this is a FAQ or something. > > I'd like to see this code in 4

[PHP-DEV] Apache2 SAPI

2003-03-06 Thread Ian Holsman
I've been using the apache2handler on two low/medium-traffic sites for a while and it appears ok to me. now.. I'm new to this list, and really don't know how it works, so excuse me if this is a FAQ or something. I'd like to see this code in 4.3.2/4.3.3?, and if it doesn't blow up, replace the '