Resent ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: php.dev Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:21 PM Subject: Re: The rand() can of worms > > > > Bad points: > > 1) Leaks > > 2) Inconsistent style > > 3) Really bizzare macros, etc. > > > Let's put one thing straigt: I merged it already in this early stage (I KNEW > it wasn't yet the way it should be, for example the macro thingy: It started > out as 2line-macro's, but went bigger. In the optimization and reflection > stage, I certainly whould have converted it to a function, but that stage > wasn't yet reached) because I thought I would ****FINALLY ****** get > comments on the whole thing (AND NOT ABOUT THE PRECISE IMPLEMENTATION, SINCE > I STATED VERY CLEARLY THAT WAS ****NOT**** YET WHERE YOU NEEDED TO PAY > ATTENTION TO). > > Maybe you don't understand my way of coding (emphasis on CORRECTNESS, the > rest comes in later stages). In fact I was REALLY in fast-coding mode > because I wanted to commit/merge it before the big part of that introduction > I was co-organising. I thought you would be able to discuss it, so after I > had time again, I could react to it (in fact, I even doubted wether I got > any reactions, since you all didn't seem to care about rand()). > > > I really dislike the way you are handling with this issue: first silently > agree, and when nearly FINISHED, go do difficult. In the Netherlads we have > a word for this kind of people, but I'm not going to write it down here... > > --jeroen > (still very angry) > > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
