Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-05 Thread Harrie Hazewinkel
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 02:13 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: [1] Function names for user-level functions should be enclosed with in the PHP_FUNCTION() macro. They should be in lowercase, with words underscore delimited, with care taken

Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-05 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: > > [1] Function names for user-level functions should be enclosed with in > > the PHP_FUNCTION() macro. They should be in lowercase, with words > > underscore delimited, with care taken to minimize the letter count. > > OK, I will admit the '_

RE: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-05 Thread John Coggeshall
For what it's worth, I am in agreement with Derick... Consistency is important.. Besides... A rose is still a rose, even if it's called sweet_smelling_flower ;) >OK, I will admit the '_' is then OK, but I rather do not use >it in this case, since I would like to use that for a more >session

Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-05 Thread Harrie Hazewinkel
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 12:17 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: Hello, while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added to the CVS recently: + PHP_F

Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-05 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: > On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added > > to the CVS recently: > > > > + PHP_FE(snmpv3get, NULL) > > + PHP_FE(snmpv3w

Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-05 Thread Harrie Hazewinkel
Hi all, (sorry if you receive it duplicate, but it did not seem to make the list last time.) On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: Hello, while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added to the CVS recently: + PHP_FE(snmpv3get, NULL) +

RE: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-04 Thread John Coggeshall
+1 >-Original Message- >From: Ilia A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:23 PM >To: Derick Rethans; PHP Developers Mailing List >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names > > >Consistency is always good and adding aliases for

Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-04 Thread Ilia A.
Consistency is always good and adding aliases for newly added functions seems like a recipe for bloat & confusion. +1 on the proposed changes. Ilia On December 4, 2002 08:49 am, Derick Rethans wrote: > Hello, > > while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added > to the CV

Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-04 Thread Dan Kalowsky
+1 for me Although I do remember the reasoning for it, it doesn't mean I like the use of the snmpv3 naming scheme either. So if anyone has any better suggestions for these, I'd still like to hear them. On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 08:49 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: Hello, while browsing

[PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

2002-12-04 Thread Derick Rethans
Hello, while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added to the CVS recently: + PHP_FE(snmpv3get, NULL) + PHP_FE(snmpv3walk, NULL) + PHP_FE(snmpv3realwalk, NULL) + PHP_FALIAS(snmpv3walkoid, snmpv3realwalk, NULL) + PHP_FE(snmpv3set, NULL) But th