Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.5.x-dev

2003-03-03 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Harald Radi wrote: sorry for this naive question, i just realized that we have php 4.5.x snapshots on snaps.php.net, i assume this is the PHP_4 branch. does that mean that PHP_4_3 and PHP_4 should kept synchronized ? Yes, general fixes can be committed to the PHP_4

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.5.x-dev

2003-03-03 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Harald Radi wrote: PHP_4 But why is the version of the PHP_4 branch 4.5, and not 4.4? -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/ -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.5.x-dev

2003-03-03 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Harald Radi wrote: sorry for this naive question, i just realized that we have php 4.5.x snapshots on snaps.php.net, i assume this is the PHP_4 branch. does that mean that PHP_4_3 and PHP_4 should kept synchronized ? is there also a PHP_4 branch in the Zend module or ist

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.5.x-dev

2003-03-03 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Harald Radi wrote: PHP_4 But why is the version of the PHP_4 branch 4.5, and not 4.4? 4.4 was used already in HEAD for some time. So we skipped it. - Sascha -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit:

[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.5.x-dev

2003-03-02 Thread Harald Radi
sorry for this naive question, i just realized that we have php 4.5.x snapshots on snaps.php.net, i assume this is the PHP_4 branch. does that mean that PHP_4_3 and PHP_4 should kept synchronized ? is there also a PHP_4 branch in the Zend module or ist HEAD supposed to be PHP_4 ? regards, Harald