Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4/ TODO-4.1.txt

2001-04-19 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: Well you know the most permanent things are temporary things such as prototypes. I also thought it would make much more sense to create something very small in C (maybe even Perl as it's installed on all systems) and use that. PERL isn't installed in

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / TODO-4.1.txt

2001-04-19 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 08:13 AM 4/19/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote: [Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Right but if we chose XML this makes it much harder to have C clients (even Perl because the module might not be installed). I don't think Over my dead body. Take a look at all the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4/ TODO-4.1.txt

2001-04-18 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
If we were to write it in C we would most likely need to provide a statically linked binary anyway for the different platforms as not everyone will have access to a fully functioning development environment. If they are compiling PHP and PHP extensions we can expect them to be able to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / TODO-4.1.txt

2001-04-18 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:21:32AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote: At 09:16 PM 4/18/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: When we're past the prototyping phase and stuff stabilizes, a C rewrite may be a good idea, but I don't think it is now. Well you know the most permanent things are