Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
By the way, when was this 4.2.0 branch created? I saw no
php-dev/php-qa discussion on this.
Derick is writing the mail in question right now. We're currently
discussing the process on #php.bugs @ EFnet.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Then according to our new versioning system, HEAD should be at 4.3.0-dev
I totally agree with that, but some persons say we never agreed upon that
new and nice versioning scheme. Anyway, it's open for discussion if you ask me.
Derick
On Wed, 27
I don't see any reason not to postpone the branching by a couple of days if
that's enough time for you.
Andi
At 11:57 AM 2/27/2002 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
I was hoping the sockets work I was planning on would make the 4.2
branch. I guess thats not possible?
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Decisions like this are not made by one person on irc. Including the
decision on when to branch. This is done on php-dev. For all you know
there are people working on stuff for 4.2 that haven't committed just yet.
You're totally right
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Decisions like this are not made by one person on irc. Including the
decision on when to branch. This is done on php-dev. For all you know
there are people working on stuff for 4.2 that haven't committed just yet.
You're totally
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Unless there is a 4.2.0 branch, why are you going to 4.2.1?
There is a PHP 4.2.0 branch.
Derick
HEAD branch was not good enough to be a release branch.
Before we branch, we should sort out known critical bugs and
try
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Decisions like this are not made by one person on irc. Including the
decision on when to branch. This is done on php-dev. For all you know
there are people working on stuff for 4.2 that haven't committed just
