Ok, whatever the mapping, my point is that I'd rather see a slightly wrong
image than a broken image. Simply removing the function is a bad idea.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Marcus [iso-8859-1] Börger wrote:
> Defenitly not because if you want to draw a non filled ellipse than
> a filled elli
Defenitly not because if you want to draw a non filled ellipse than
a filled ellipse is very different.
As far as i understand the documentation
ImageEllipse(x,y,w,h,c) = ImageArc(x,y,w,h,0,360,c)
If so we can easiliy map ImageEllipse to ImageArc if ImageEllipse is not
present.
marcus
At 18:3
It might be an idea to alias it to imagefilledellipse instead of just
deleting it. Then it wouldn't break stuff. If the current fill colour is
set, then it will be slightly wrong, but I think that is slightly better
than a broken image.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> hell
