On 7 Aug 2001, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
If there were a thousand extensions, we may have to rethink it - but
the good solution would probably be JIT initialization.
Now we're talking! I assume it is not straightforward, what are the
technical challenges in doing JIT module
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
How so? I can understand that people get used to it, but it's really
bad. extensions should be loaded in the php.ini file. There's really no
good reason for using dl() over the php.ini method.
Of
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 19:40 06/08/2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 07:10 06/08/2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
What if you use 50 different shared extensions, for different
scripts on the same box? Should you load
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 19:40 06/08/2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 07:10 06/08/2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
What if you use 50 different shared extensions, for different
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think the disk weights about the same regardless of the data inside it
:)
Yes, but 50 extensions will consume more memory than 1.
Nothing noticable, really. Unless you allocate dozens of megabytes in
