On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 06:48:42PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote :
> BTW, Zend does not complain for following line.
> (with or without this patch)
>
> SOME_LABEL_NOT_DEFINED;
>
> Is this intended behavior?
Good questions. I've observed this too. It's an undefined
constant, therefore evalu
Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>
>>Zak Greant wrote:
>>
>>> I talked to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this quite some time ago. IIRC, we
>>> agreed that <<- heredoc syntax was an acceptable way to handle this.
>>> The <<- syntax would work like the same way as <<
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Zak Greant wrote:
>
>> I talked to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this quite some time ago. IIRC, we
>> agreed that <<- heredoc syntax was an acceptable way to handle this.
>> The <<- syntax would work like the same way as <<- in bash.
>>
> Hi Zak,
> I worked for you :)
>
>
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Zak Greant wrote:
> > I talked to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this quite some time ago. IIRC, we
> > agreed that <<- heredoc syntax was an acceptable way to handle this.
> > The <<- syntax would work like the same way as <<- in bash.
> >
> Hi Zak,
> I
Zak Greant wrote:
> I talked to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this quite some time ago. IIRC, we
> agreed that <<- heredoc syntax was an acceptable way to handle this.
> The <<- syntax would work like the same way as <<- in bash.
>
Hi Zak,
I worked for you :)
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Index: Zend/zend_
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 04:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
> > > therefore i wrote 'on its own line'. i suppose heredoc is handled by
> > > the scanner, so this should not be a problem.
>
> It's handled by the scanner indeed
>
> > >
> > > yohgaki: you wer
