Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

2001-10-06 Thread James Moore

we were going to set up [EMAIL PROTECTED] at one point with a closed list of
recieptients.. mainly core devs and a few QA People who can check out if it
is a security problem or not.

Dont think this ever happen. Perhaps it would be an idea though

- James
- Original Message -
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Flavio Veloso [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:21 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address


 Oh Jani, relax.  He wanted somewhere non-public.  php-dev is archived
 everywhere as is [EMAIL PROTECTED]  group@ is the only non-archived
 address.  If there is a real problem we will most definitely forward it to
 php-dev, but if someone asks for a private contact address I give the only
 one we have.  Most of these are false alarms anyway.

 -Rasmus

 On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:

 
  What's wrong with php-dev? IIRC the [EMAIL PROTECTED] handles
  only administration of the site and stuff..
  There can't be anything that fatal that all the people
  subscribed to php-dev shouldn't see. Or has PHP suddenly
  changed into closed-source?
 
  --Jani
 
 
 
  On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
 
  use [EMAIL PROTECTED] please
  
  On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Flavio Veloso wrote:
  
   Hi Webmaster.
  
   Is there any mail address that can be used to discuss security issues
   related to PHP?
  
   We know that we could use your bug tracking system to report
problems,
   but it doesn't seem appropriate to disclose a security bug before PHP
   developers have a chance to look at it.
  
   We are a Linux and network security research company that lives in
   Brazil. Maybe we have discovered a problem which has some security
   implications. We are not completely sure if it's a bug in PHP (and
how
   to solve it, even if it isn't), and would like to share it with the
   PHP people privately.
  
   BTW, sorry to bother you with this, but your mail address was the
only
   one I could find on the www.php.net website.
  
  
  
 


 --
 PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

2001-10-06 Thread Hojtsy Gabor

 we were going to set up [EMAIL PROTECTED] at one point with a closed list
of
 recieptients.. mainly core devs and a few QA People who can check out if
it
 is a security problem or not.

 Dont think this ever happen. Perhaps it would be an idea though

+1

Goba


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

2001-10-05 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf

Oh Jani, relax.  He wanted somewhere non-public.  php-dev is archived
everywhere as is [EMAIL PROTECTED]  group@ is the only non-archived
address.  If there is a real problem we will most definitely forward it to
php-dev, but if someone asks for a private contact address I give the only
one we have.  Most of these are false alarms anyway.

-Rasmus

On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:


 What's wrong with php-dev? IIRC the [EMAIL PROTECTED] handles
 only administration of the site and stuff..
 There can't be anything that fatal that all the people
 subscribed to php-dev shouldn't see. Or has PHP suddenly
 changed into closed-source?

 --Jani



 On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

 use [EMAIL PROTECTED] please
 
 On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Flavio Veloso wrote:
 
  Hi Webmaster.
 
  Is there any mail address that can be used to discuss security issues
  related to PHP?
 
  We know that we could use your bug tracking system to report problems,
  but it doesn't seem appropriate to disclose a security bug before PHP
  developers have a chance to look at it.
 
  We are a Linux and network security research company that lives in
  Brazil. Maybe we have discovered a problem which has some security
  implications. We are not completely sure if it's a bug in PHP (and how
  to solve it, even if it isn't), and would like to share it with the
  PHP people privately.
 
  BTW, sorry to bother you with this, but your mail address was the only
  one I could find on the www.php.net website.
 
 
 



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

2001-10-05 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf

 So what's wrong in keeping them public?
 If they are false alarms, why not keep
 them public and show all other people who think they found
 serious security related bugs that they are wrong?
 If it's opensource KEEP it open. There can't be any closed
 'groups' which get some info in this kind of projects.
 If there are, it's no longer opensource..IMO.

Two issues:

1. A private correspondence channel was requested.  You are saying there
   cannot be private communications in open source?  Believe me there is
   plenty of private communications going on in all the various open
   source projects and it doesn't make them any less open source.  Telling
   someone that they are not allowed to communicate with members of the
   PHP development team in a private manner makes no sense.  Perhaps we
   need a [EMAIL PROTECTED] private mailing list for this instead where
   only people with php-dev cvs accounts can subscribe and either not
   archive or at least delay the archiving of messages to the list by
   a couple of weeks.

2. If this is indeed a big security hole we have to treat it in a
   responsible manner.  We need to communicate the problem as quickly as
   possible *along with the fix*.  It is common practice, bugtraq and
   elsewhere, to not publically announce security issues without an
   accompanying fix so that you aren't giving the black hats a big window
   of time to exploit the security hole.  That doesn't mean we can just
   sit on a security issue, we have to address it in a timely manner, but
   I see nothing wrong with limiting the distribution list and certainly
   not immediately injecting an exploit into every search engine in the
   world.

-Rasmus


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

2001-10-05 Thread Alexander Wagner

Jani Taskinen wrote:
 So what's wrong in keeping them public?
 If they are false alarms, why not keep
 them public and show all other people who think they found
 serious security related bugs that they are wrong?
 If it's opensource KEEP it open. There can't be any closed
 'groups' which get some info in this kind of projects.
 If there are, it's no longer opensource..IMO.

Even for open source projects, it is good practice to keep security 
issues closed until a fix has been released.
As long as there is no fix, making it public won't help anyone except 
the black hats. IMO.

And possible security issues shouldn't be considered bogus by default.

regards
Wagner

-- 
Ein Mathematiker ist eine Maschine, die Kaffee in Theoreme verwandelt.
Paul Erdös, Mathematiker, 1913-1996

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

2001-10-05 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf

someone that they are not allowed to communicate with members of the
PHP development team in a private manner makes no sense.  Perhaps we
need a [EMAIL PROTECTED] private mailing list for this instead where
only people with php-dev cvs accounts can subscribe and either not
archive or at least delay the archiving of messages to the list by
a couple of weeks.

 Excellent idea. This is exactly something we really need.
 A private address which is not limited to 10 persons or so.
 What did Linus say again..enough eyes and all bugs are..something?

I'm really not all that worried about having the ability to fix issues in
the small group or at least understanding the issue and bringing in the
appropriate people privately to come up with a fix.  So the number of
people receiving that initial email really doesn't worry me.  Heck it
could be a single person we designate to be the security officer and
rotate that responsibility.  It isn't that hard to figure out who wrote a
specific piece and if you have been around a while you know the people who
are likely to be able to provide some insight.

 Also, the other issue are the so called 'script kiddies'..so you're right
 in this.

Yes, the majority of the attacks out there are really not very advanced.
Just some kid who downloads an exploit from somewhere.  If we can make a
bit harder for these kids, we should.

-Rasmus


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Security e-mail address

2001-10-05 Thread Zeev Suraski

At 04:36 06-10-01, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Jani said:
  Excellent idea. This is exactly something we really need.
  A private address which is not limited to 10 persons or so.
  What did Linus say again..enough eyes and all bugs are..something?

I'm really not all that worried about having the ability to fix issues in
the small group or at least understanding the issue and bringing in the
appropriate people privately to come up with a fix.  So the number of
people receiving that initial email really doesn't worry me.  Heck it
could be a single person we designate to be the security officer and
rotate that responsibility.  It isn't that hard to figure out who wrote a
specific piece and if you have been around a while you know the people who
are likely to be able to provide some insight.

The number of people who get to see it does worry me - it has to be 
reasonably small to be manageable, which is why I think that the way it 
works today is pretty good (such reports go to group@, adding 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a good idea too, I don't like the security-officer idea 
too much though).  This can't be an open-forum such as php-dev either, for 
obvious reasons.
The 'enough eyeballs' rule doesn't apply here, at least it doesn't apply in 
many cases.  If something is safe enough to be sent out in the open in 
php-dev, no problem.  If it's a bad bug, e.g., a remotely exploitable bug, 
fixing it silently, involving only the people who are related to the faulty 
code, is probably the best practice.

Zeev


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]