Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> You do not have to feel like an idiot, I always specify the width&height
> for the images.
Well, since I had somehow "forgotten" that I could use getimagesize() with
every image display, I do, but if it had been a question of using the
database to save width&height, I do
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:49:43 +0100
"Rickard Andersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To tell you the truth, I never really thought about running
> getimagesize() to get width="x" height="y" when displaying the images.
> For some reason I always thought that I would be forced to save the
> width and
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> I don't agree.
> An avatar, by nature, has a fixed _image_ size. If you allow variable
> avatar image sizes, then you still have the option to use that same
> getimagesize()
> to set the width and height attributes of the HTML IMG tag and the browser
> (any browser), will re
At 20:56 12-1-2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
The filesize (with max upload size) will preserve of big image upload.
Render the image inside a html image can be fixed with the size
properties (which exist for this purpose...).
I m against to add this to the current imagesize function, by default
Hello,
I do not think this is a good solution, and starting to check the
internal data of each images (think about bmp or any 'raw' images
format).
The filesize (with max upload size) will preserve of big image upload.
Render the image inside a html image can be fixed with the size
properties (wh
At 09:55 7-1-2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
At 01:43 07.01.2003, Rickard Andersson wrote:
I'd be glad to write a patch for image.c (function php_handle_gif()), but I
though I should ask you guys first. I wouldn't want to do it in vain. As it
is now I've got PHP code that checks this for me to preven
At 04:20 08.01.2003, Rickard Andersson wrote:
BTW. I'm kinda new to contributing to large projects as this one. Should I
checkout the latest CVS and patch agains that or should I use some other
base for my alterations?
Please check out HEAD (latest) and send a unified diff (diff -u) to this list
Marcus Börger wrote:
> The advantage is that this would retrieve the correct size even for gifs
> with multiple images. On the other hand the disadvantage is speed loss.
I've been giving this some thought. Shouldn't getimagesize() just return
false if the "actual size" (the largest size found in
Marcus: could you specify the speed loss? If it's noticeable I would
rather suggest to either introduce a new function or another parameter
to getimagesize(), no matter what the default is (e.g. let
getimagesize() get the "real" size and introduce something like
getimagesize_fast()) or the other
Marcus Börger schrieb:
> At 01:43 07.01.2003, Rickard Andersson wrote:
> >getimagesize() blindly trusts the width and height
> >specified in the header
> >of gifs. You can just hexedit the file and set the width
> >and height to any
> >value and getimagesize() will believe that is the "true
> >size
At 01:43 07.01.2003, Rickard Andersson wrote:
getimagesize() blindly trusts the width and height specified in the header
of gifs. You can just hexedit the file and set the width and height to any
value and getimagesize() will believe that is the "true size" of the image.
Even worse - Internet Expl
My only contribution to PHP thus far is the following bug report/feature
request (#18052):
getimagesize() blindly trusts the width and height specified in the header
of gifs. You can just hexedit the file and set the width and height to any
value and getimagesize() will believe that is the "true s
12 matches
Mail list logo
