[[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stig Sæther Bakken)]
> [Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> >
> > >+1, perhaps from an api perspective we could have something like:
> > >
> > >$vn = php_get_version(GD);
> > >
> > >or if the argument is empty, retur
[Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>
> >+1, perhaps from an api perspective we could have something like:
> >
> >$vn = php_get_version(GD);
> >
> >or if the argument is empty, return the main php version:
> >
> >$phpVer = php_get_vers
Hi,
> >Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful
is
> >a built-in way to determine optional parts of extensions, like something
to
> >check if GD supports GIF/PNG/etc. This way, you can check the version and
> >the optional parts.
>
> You mean this:
> http://www.ph
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Stig Bakken wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sander Steffann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > PHP_VERSION_NUM
> >
> > +1 from me too.
> >
> > > Example:
> > > GD_EXT_VERSION = 30201
> >
> > Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is
> > a built-i
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > PHP_VERSION_NUM
>
> +1 from me too.
>
> > Example:
> > GD_EXT_VERSION = 30201
>
> Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is
> a built-in way to determine optional parts of extensions, like something to
Hi,
> PHP_VERSION_NUM
+1 from me too.
> Example:
> GD_EXT_VERSION = 30201
Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is
a built-in way to determine optional parts of extensions, like something to
check if GD supports GIF/PNG/etc. This way, you can check the versi
Hello,
hrm, I swear I saw this before... but I say again that I think this is a
very good idea, this weill make BC much less probably, for example, I
still remember the probs with the DOMXML extension...
+2
Derick
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> v.m.b = v * 1 + m * 100 + b
>
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> I was thinking of PEAR too, don't worry. :)
> But the versioning scheme/rules for PHP must be strict.
>
> Consider following:
>
> We have a numeric version constant:
>
> PHP_VERSION_NUM
>
> the value for this is calculated with this simple formula:
>
