At 22:05 23.01.2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
The current OO implementation ( ... bla ... ) final ( ... bla ... )
I just updated the patch and it is getting a bit smaller due to latest engine
changes. I also moved the check code from zend_language_parser.y into
zend_compile.c (as suggested by...i t
At 10:34 30.01.2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
MB>> If you want real life examples (and surely it seems you will never
MB>> trust me) get yourself a book from scott meyers (going to my
I would certainly trust you if you gave me an example. Marcus, I'm not
here to personally attack you. I just do
MB>> If you want real life examples (and surely it seems you will never
MB>> trust me) get yourself a book from scott meyers (going to my
I would certainly trust you if you gave me an example. Marcus, I'm not
here to personally attack you. I just do not see the value of this
feature. If you do -
At 09:46 29.01.2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
MB>> Sure it cannot because insert cannot. The problem and the error you did
MB>> above is that you split an operation into two. Your real operation is
MB>> insert_with_password and that is different from insert. Again insert
is an
That's the whole
MB>> Sure it cannot because insert cannot. The problem and the error you did
MB>> above is that you split an operation into two. Your real operation is
MB>> insert_with_password and that is different from insert. Again insert is an
That's the whole point of OO - to allow overloading the same opera
At 15:52 27.01.2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
MB>> Consider you defined a container (list, vector what ever) and want
MB>> to derive from it. Then there is *really*no* need to override methods
MB>> like "insert" or "remove". You may want to have additional things like
MB>> "insert_if" or whatever
MB>> Consider you defined a container (list, vector what ever) and want
MB>> to derive from it. Then there is *really*no* need to override methods
MB>> like "insert" or "remove". You may want to have additional things like
MB>> "insert_if" or whatever. But for the container part "insert" must stay
The current OO implementation of ZE2 only allows dynamically
binding of methods. That is all functions are inherited like if they
were declared "virtual" in other languages.
The thing we do not have is static binding of methods. First one
could argue that we do not have a type system and
On
