Stig S. Bakken wrote:
+1 on md5_file().
Who is the mantainer of the standard extension? I have the corrected patch.
--
Alessandro 'Asterix75' Astarita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web site: http://asterix75.capri.it
E-commerce software: http://www.alfacomm.it/
--
PHP Development Mailing List
Hello Alessandro,
just mail it to me, I'll apply it for you.
Derick
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Alessandro Astarita wrote:
Stig S. Bakken wrote:
+1 on md5_file().
Who is the mantainer of the standard extension? I have the corrected patch.
--
Alessandro 'Asterix75' Astarita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
shouldnt it be file_md5 if we are sticking with out namespace convention.
- James
- Original Message -
From: Chris Newbill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PHP DEV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:57 AM
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] md5sum() patch
Nahh I think md5_file() isn't very
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:00:02AM -, James Moore wrote:
shouldnt it be file_md5 if we are sticking with out namespace convention.
i think james is right:
+1 on file_md5
-1 on overloading
tc
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Alessandro Astarita wrote:
In this way you load in memory all the file contents and then you hash it.
It's not the same. My function is the php version of the md5sum utility that
you can find at example in Linux (textutils package).
Then
Hello,
we already have md5() as a function. md5sum() will then be the same as:
echo md5(join (, file (filename)));
do you really think this new function is needed? And I think that the name
is not very well chosen either...
regards,
Derick
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Alessandro Astarita wrote:
I
Il 16:28, giovedì 15 novembre 2001, Derick Rethans ha scritto:
we already have md5() as a function. md5sum() will then be the same as:
echo md5(join (, file (filename)));
In this way you load in memory all the file contents and then you hash it.
It's not the same. My function is the php
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Alessandro Astarita wrote:
In this way you load in memory all the file contents and then you hash it.
It's not the same. My function is the php version of the md5sum utility that
you can find at example in Linux (textutils package).
Then this will do the same:
$sum =
Il 17:25, giovedì 15 novembre 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Then this will do the same:
$sum = `md5sum filename`;
Do I have to depends on the external executable? ...in my opinion is not the
right way.
--
Alessandro 'Asterix75' Astarita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:25:24 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Alessandro Astarita wrote:
In this way you load in memory all the file contents and then you hash it.
It's not the same. My function is the php version of the md5sum utility that
you can find at example
Then this will do the same:
$sum = `md5sum filename`;
Yes it will, but only if you have safe-mode disabled, and you're running
Unix or Linux. +1 for adding this function.
Sander
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Alessandro Astarita wrote:
Il 17:25, giovedì 15 novembre 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Then this will do the same:
$sum = `md5sum filename`;
Do I have to depends on the external executable? ...in my opinion is not
the right way.
+1 to the function
--
Lenar Lõhmus
Vision Group
Lenar Lõhmus wrote:
Alessandro Astarita wrote:
Il 17:25, giovedì 15 novembre 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Then this will do the same:
$sum = `md5sum filename`;
Do I have to depends on the external executable? ...in my opinion is not
the right way.
+1 to the function
hm, what about
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Lenar Lõhmus wrote:
hm, what about just overloading the current md5 function?
if given a string - current behavior
if given a file handle resource - read file and return sum
That is a possibility, better then having a new function. Although
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is a possibility, better then having a new function. Although it
makes it a bit obscure IMO. But I can live with it :)
Why is it better than having a new function? What's wrong with having a
new function? Name it md5_file() and it's pretty
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Why is it better than having a new function?
because i realy like function overloading ;)
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
because i realy like function overloading ;)
I need to use some holy water on you.
-Andrei
A room without books is like a body without a soul.
-- Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.)
--
PHP Development Mailing List
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:37:22PM +0100, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote :
Lenar Lõhmus wrote:
Alessandro Astarita wrote:
Il 17:25, giovedì 15 novembre 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Then this will do the same:
$sum = `md5sum filename`;
Do I have to depends on the external executable?
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Markus Fischer wrote:
$m45sum = md5_file($f);
I guess you probably meant this:
$md5sum = md5_file('filename');
Joao
--
João Prado Maia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://phpbrasil.com - php com um jeitinho brasileiro
--
Precisando de consultoria em
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:08:00PM -0500, Joao Prado Maia wrote :
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Markus Fischer wrote:
$m45sum = md5_file($f);
I guess you probably meant this:
$md5sum = md5_file('filename');
No. I refered to Hartmut who suggested:
H if given a
Forget the message, finally managed to confuse myself ^_^
Joao, you were of course right.
- Markus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail:
-Original Message-
From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Hartmut Holzgraefe
Cc: Lenar Lõhmus; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] md5sum() patch
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:37:22PM +0100, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote :
Lenar Lõhmus
22 matches
Mail list logo
