On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > Check out this bug report:
> >
> > http://bugs.php.net/16155
>
> Ah thanks, that's where I remember the discussion from. I do disagree
> with one part:
>
>(c) It shouldn't be possible to prevent $_GET, $_POST,
>$_COOKIE, and $_FILES
> Check out this bug report:
>
> http://bugs.php.net/16155
Ah thanks, that's where I remember the discussion from. I do disagree
with one part:
(c) It shouldn't be possible to prevent $_GET, $_POST,
$_COOKIE, and $_FILES from being populated.
Why in the world not? I explicitly ne
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Guys, I think this was brought up before, and I somehow had the impression
> that we fixed it, but we didn't. Currently if variables_order does not
> contain a certain type then that type will not be populated in the $_FOO
> superglobal. So, if you se
Guys, I think this was brought up before, and I somehow had the impression
that we fixed it, but we didn't. Currently if variables_order does not
contain a certain type then that type will not be populated in the $_FOO
superglobal. So, if you set variables_order = "GP" because you only want
Get a
