hi,
i'd appreciate this feature very much (perhaps many others also will)...
in most of my setups (about 10 servers) i need to compile both versions and
keeping apache module and command line php setup in sync is somewhat hard
and sometimes problematic ;)
b.
I was wondering if there's
hi,
i am using vpopmail for a large site with many users signing in or changing
quotas, etc. for those who are not familiar to vpopmail - it is free qmail
addon to implement easy virtual domain management - more info on
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/.
the site is wholy php based. for more than
hi,
i do not like this too but this are the names exported by vpopmail api.
this can be changed very easy. i am currently waiting for reply from David
about what the php api support, what not and how...
b.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Zmievski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "David Croft"
sorry for broken english.
I just wanted to say that vpopmail's api uses function naming convention
which is incomatible with php style. This is the reason to name php
functions after vpopmail api, prefixing them with vpopmail_. We can fix this
easy.
b.
- Original Message -
From: "
hi,
sure.
can i ask you another style question?
snips form a config.m4 file:
---
AC_MSG_RESULT(found in $VPOPMAIL_LIB_DIR)
---
---
AC_MSG_CHECKING(for vpopmail install directory)
... code follows...
AC_MSG_RESULT($VPOPMAIL_DIR)
---
i wonder which one is preferable to use.
b.
- Original
hi,
Another thing: Would it be good idea to have the EXPERIMENTAL
text in configure help for such options? This could be automated
in the buildconf ie. it could check if the EXPERIMENTAL is in the
extension's dir and adds the text before/after the option in
the help display..? And maybe
hi,
i'd disagree on this - imagine you have a webserver with reasonable load and
99.9% of php page requests use max 10mb ram. you have 1% that use 100mb ram.
then it not a good idea to upgrade to 1g ram just for these 0.1% since each
httpd process will hold 100mb ram after certain time (the 0.1%
hi,
indeed it is theoretically impossible to track this :)
implement a recursive alrorithm for something e.g.:
function foo($n) { // calc $n!
if ($n=1)
return $n;
else
return foo($n-1)*$n;
}
now tell me if it is infinite or finite? ;-) this is a verification and
cannot
hi,
indeed it is theoretically impossible to track this :)
implement a recursive alrorithm for something e.g.:
function foo($n) { // calc $n!
if ($n=1)
return $n;
else
return foo($n-1)*$n;
}
now tell me if it is infinite or finite? ;-) this is a
hi,
i've seen the same really soon and could track it:
Cool, I looked further down the specific config.m4 and it
appears that the zlib check was copied and not modified
correctly. Fix committed.
10x :)) it was annoying and hard to track because i have 10+ --with-
configure
hi,
can someone commit the
followingchange:
Index:
ext/standard/exec.h===RCS
file: /repository/php4/ext/standard/exec.h,vretrieving revision 1.6diff
-u -r1.6 exec.h--- ext/standard/exec.h 2000/09/05
16:55:32 1.6+++
Well, I think it's just the link order of libraries. ie. the
openssl lib should be before libc..but is that even possible?
Or just add another entry for libc after ssl?
Might be possible to do some kludge with the link order, I would prefer
that OpenSSL changed a bit though, I'll probably
hi,
this is not m4 but /bin/sh stuff... afaik [[ is bash specific boolean test.
so the patch _seems_ to be correct...
b.
- Original Message -
From: "Andr Langhorst" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "PHP Development" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 5:31 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV]
forgot to say that in case of [[ the test word is not needed - [[ is a test
itself:
if [[ -x somefile ]]; .
if test -x somefile;
b.
- Original Message -
From: "Boian Bonev" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Andr Langhorst" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "PHP Developmen
hi,
[i move this to php-dev where is the right place IMHO]
indeed the library is used by me, you and perhapse two more people (two have
asked how to get/make/use it). my code is not problematic to change - i am
using different servers for test and production and i can change it with not
more
Just +1 :)
- Original Message -
From: "Stanislav Malyshev" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Ron Chmara" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "PHP Development" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming
Are you sure you're using the php4.0.4pl1 source tarball from
www.php.net??
I just checked that file and it doesn't have any #line directives in it.
[2001-03-02 14:04:44] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the following is the second line of the file
[path-to-php]/ext/standard/url_scanner_ex.c :
#line 1
Yes, in CVS those directives can be found. But not in CVS snapshots
or in releases. So this shouldn't be a problem if people are using
those.
these are put automaticaly by re2c. it is invoked with full path in make
file, so it generates #line-s with full path.
non-developers really do not
did you
rm httpd
make
or
make clean all install?
b.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Gibbons" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Bug Database" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 3:17 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: PHP 4.0 Bug #9529 Updated: php4_module is garbled
ldd httpd
hi,
i'd suggest to make things simpler - just plain pre-generated html with
the
notes part. name it after TOPIC and include it in the proper place. the
generator script may run as cron job. there is only one problem - to
prevent
rsync client from getting a semi-generated copy. this can be
Encountered 100 spanned cmd.exe + php.exe using win32 CGI, this does
not happen using apachemod, my task manager was open by accident,
otherwise I would not have noticed this...
sounds like the second php 'detects' CGI mode, reads script name from
environment vars then executes the same
hi,
header("Foo: bar\r\n");
Get rid of that CRLF and it should work.
this is an idea. what about if header stripped all \n \r? i cant see a
reasonable use of \n in a header line...
b.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
hi,
today i made something crazy - even i didn't believe it will do but i made
it through and i want to hear your opinion...
i am getting pissed from writing c code in one of our client's radius
servers and decided to ease the whole process, put it under control and make
the auth/account logic
oops, forgot the list.
i think no lang extension is needed. here is my reason - you can very easy
test for isset, what about !isset? then the condition will be or not and and
all the thing becomes messy.
b.
- Original Message -
From: "Boian Bonev" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: &qu
hi,
I won't be holding my breath for it. That's the basic property of
reference-counting, so it's not easy to make it behave differently.
Anyway, unless you have very-long-running very-memory-greedy scripts,
these leaks shouldn't bother you - Zend memory manager cleans them up on
every
hi,
i know. the problem is i have used the thttpd sapi module as a sample and it
is supposed to be stable. i have solved my problem by using plain
malloc/free - my reason to share this experience is that there may be a leak
or segfault in some of the sapi modules. i haven't found neighter bug
hi,
There was a discussion about things to break in 4.1. magic_quotes_gpc
would
definitely be my favourite. I'd like to see it set to off for good and
removed from php.ini.
I'd be completely against removing the concept of magic_quotes altogether.
We can discuss changing the default,
Generally, the emalloc should be working all the way since
start_memory_manager was called - which means, from engine startup. The
"request cleanup" (freeing all non-persistent memory blocks) happens on
shutdown_memory_manager, which is called from php_request_shutdown,
after calling
Perhaps optionally disabled.. --without-cgi?
I would go for optionally on, I really dont want to build both the
apache
module (p.e.) AND the CGi at the same time. For QA testing this is fine,
but not for production servers.
If you want to use the PEAR tools, you need the CGI version.
i'd also preffer to have both versions - on all of my production servers
i
do install both apache module and cgi version. the latter i use for cron
jobs, background processing and whatsoever tasks that need to do
something
outside the web. so in my opinion both sapi module and cgi will be
hi,
i am speaking for the main branch. if the community decides that adding a
function declaration can break anything then just do not commit this into
4.0.5 :)
as far as i have seen many major changes have been made to 4.0.5. anyway it
will work both ways except that calling the function with
You could have two classes both defining an innocent method toString(),
for example, and with your suggestion, inheriting from those classes
would cause a hard error? Why would "first encountered" definition
change?
If anything that affected how classes were ordered changed, if the
hi,
Maybe something like this
1. Any problems which result in seg faults/gpfs are show stoppers, code
doesnt
go out till its fixed, or feature is removed till we can fix it.
this is not correct (in general :) - there are segfaults in experimental
stuff that do not imply exploits, are no
i forgot to say that maybe we shall add two more bugs from this one -
- a feature request for not allowing nonsense settings like the mentioned in
the list
- i don't know if is it a good idea post file upload to generate a warning
when limit is exceeded
b.
- Original Message -
From:
sure. i guess at least about egpcs handling, arg separator, magic quotes,
perhapse some session options, register_globals, safe_mode.
lets make a list - this can be easily fixed. :)
b.
- Original Message -
From: Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
hi,
That only really works for forking webservers, does it not? Another
alternative
would be to use microseconds...
Yeah we could use microseconds but are they available on all platforms?
In any case, on non-forking servers we can use thread id.
if it is a threading server then why not
Note that there was no such problem with PHP 4.0.4pl1 and earlier.
That's very odd, as PHP never considered \r alone to be a linefeed...
it is not that odd because it may have treated it like whitespace - imagine
a long line script. now it may treat it not as whitespace and hence the
problem
I would like to put my mailparse (As seen on zend.com weekly summary)
extension into CVS; shall I just check it into php4/ext?
i'd also like to see this one released in php. :)
b.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
- Original Message -
From: Boian Bonev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6
hi,
And also line number don't get incremented if there are no line ends, so
all syntax errors are reported as being on line
One thing I'd like to see is a utility which could check a source
directory and
warn about obviously deprecated / insecure / inefficient things. It'd make
life
easier for that hypothetical ISP admin with a large pile of code which has
been
haphazardly maintained for years.
hey, guys, how do
hi,
then maybe close the related bug 10136...
although it would be better if win32 smtp code is made more consistent and
compatible with the unix sendmail one
b.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:33 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV]
then maybe close the related bug 10136...
or better reopen both, since this is a problem.
although it would be better if win32 smtp code is made more consistent
and
compatible with the unix sendmail one
Making Cc and cc both work is a one-line fix. (Patch attached, but as I
can not
At link I'm getting gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic'
My gcc version:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
It's not an error but is this option really necessary?
i've seen in
At link I'm getting gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic'
My gcc version:
Reading specs from
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
It's not an error but is this option really necessary?
i've
i can see just one reason - most people use the same php binary both for cgi
and shell scripting. if this change is to be introduced in php then at least
three builds will be performed - for shell, cgi and web server module. btw
what happened with the change to the build system to allow
no response, so i noticed that i forgot to cc: the dev list.
b.
- Original Message -
From: Boian Bonev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard php_string.h string.c
please check bug id 13385, i hope that this is my mistake or inappropriate
build, but if i am not wrong, it is a serious thing...
in short ? echo nl2br(asd\n\ndsa\r\rqwe\r\n\newq\n\r\r) ? hangs with
latest cvs.
b.
- Original Message -
From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
, i'll post a patch
b.
- Original Message -
From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boian Bonev [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Sascha Schumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug id #11998 - source code patch - Dont Use Previous
Andi
At 06:46 PM 9/21/2001 +0300, Boian Bonev wrote:
please check bug id 13385, i hope that this is my mistake or
inappropriate
build, but if i am not wrong, it is a serious thing...
in short ? echo nl2br(asd\n\ndsa\r\rqwe\r\n\newq\n\r\r) ? hangs
with
latest cvs.
b
why not = then. imo the parser will easily distinguish array definition
from an expression
b.
- Original Message -
From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stig Sæther Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
BB why not = then. imo the parser will easily distinguish array
BB definition from an expression
The last thing we need is symbol reuse. The parser can distinguish a lot
of things, the problem is that the human developer would be confused. =
has a clear meaning in PHP, adding other meaning
hi Daniel,
when I look at /ext/ (PHP source) just to pick a random example:
what's 'vpopmail' doing there (no personal offense to the author,
really randomly picked)? I mean, vpopmail has it's own deamon and an
interface written in PHP (ok, that one is ugly, it depends on global
variables
For some reason ncurses ends up twice in internal_functions_cli.c; I
can't figure out why though:
phpext_overload_ptr,
phpext_ncurses_ptr,
phpext_ncurses_ptr,
phpext_mysql_ptr,
xmm. i couldn't verify this... (updated before 10-20 minutes)
phpext_overload_ptr,
53 matches
Mail list logo
