ID: 11592 Updated by: rasmus Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Old-Status: Open Status: Analyzed Bug Type: Feature/Change Request Operating system: PHP Version: 4.0.5 Assigned To: Comments: The problem is that at least with Apache we cannot use SIGALRM as Apache has taken that. When PHP is running as an embedded module in a web server, messing with the signals is usally a no-no. If you can come up with some way of doing this cleanly without signals, please speak up. And by the way, fsockopen() has a timeout parameter. Previous Comments: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2001-06-20 17:12:15] [EMAIL PROTECTED] As mentionned in #9676, in #8595 and in comments in the set_time_limit function online manual page, set_time_limit seems to be not suitable to solve some problems like : - fopen on a url for which the distant server is not responding - exec an external program which hangs - trying to resolve some DNS name - sleep() - etc. The "better" solution I've read was a suggestion to use SOAP or XML-RPC to wrap such requests... this would be like using a hammer to kill a fly... :) It would be _great_ to have a mecanism (based on an alarm signal or similar for instance) to be able to define a timeout on all low-level functions (or at least some of them like fopen, fsockopen, exec, gethostby...). Such a missing feature can be a show stopper one for people needing to retrieve data from an (unreliable?) external datafeed for instance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION! Do NOT reply to this email! To reply, use the web interface found at http://bugs.php.net/?id=11592&edit=2 -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
