[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: ; arg seperator

2001-04-04 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 23:04 3/4/2001, Joey Smith wrote: > I've never bought into this argument, because these companies >can include a "config.php", or something like that, which uses >ini_set() to set up the INI file however they need it... ini_set() is run after the input parsing is already done, so it wo

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-04 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 22:52 3/4/2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: >lets follow the "break it hard, break it early" rule here ... It's kind of difficult to do that now, that this behavior has been around for the last 4 years :) It'll never be early. Zeev -- PHP Development Mailing List To u

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-04 Thread Zeev Suraski
I don't think it's a very good idea. I think that crossposting in mailing list such as php-dev and php-qa makes perfect sense, because of the significant (yet far from 100%) overlap between the two lists. You could just get your filters to filter out duplicate letters (there's a good procmai

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-03 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please stop crossposting to the PHP-DEV and the PHP-QA mailing list. Most > people interesting in this theme are reading both. And so it is really > annoying to get everything twice. a bad idea IMHO as long as the topic is related to both lists as this will break the th

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-03 Thread eschmid+sic
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:37:59PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote: > >Speaking of this, I think we need to collect all of these types of > >issues that are waiting for a "4.1" release somewhere, so we can get a > >clear idea of when 4.1 is appropriate. An

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-03 Thread James Moore
> Same here. I know there's a few things like this out there...I am going > to bed now. If no one else has done it before I wake, I'll start doing > some digging. > > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following to Joey > Smith, PHP...: > > > At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrot

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-03 Thread Joey Smith
Same here. I know there's a few things like this out there...I am going to bed now. If no one else has done it before I wake, I'll start doing some digging. On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following to Joey Smith, PHP...: > At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote: > >Speaking of

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-03 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote: >Speaking of this, I think we need to collect all of these types of >issues that are waiting for a "4.1" release somewhere, so we can get a >clear idea of when 4.1 is appropriate. Anyone know of any off-hand? If >not, I can go search the archives... I

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-03 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 02:46 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote: >Just wanted to toss in my .02 here... > >Anyone who wrote scripts in the past expecting: foo.php?a=1;2;3 to get >"$a=1;2;3" was relying on a bug, or at the very LEAST an undocumented >feature. So if it goes away, it goes away. It should never have wor

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

2001-04-03 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
Joey Smith wrote: > > Just wanted to toss in my .02 here... > > Anyone who wrote scripts in the past expecting: foo.php?a=1;2;3 to get > "$a=1;2;3" was relying on a bug, or at the very LEAST an undocumented > feature. So if it goes away, it goes away. It should never have worked > to begin with,