On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:24:08PM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Ok, I have merged it and tested it on one of my servers. Didn't break
Thanks. Now I see your commit and the 4.0.7 branch, maybe I made some
silly mistake or the cvsweb page for ldap.c was cached or something.
anything. But
Ok, I have merged it and tested it on one of my servers. Didn't break
anything. But where exactly is the ldap_result_entry freed? I am
guessing that it is actually the same memory as ldap_result points to and
when we free ldap_result there is no need to free the nested
ldap_result_entry? Is
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 10:40:04PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
If it's a bug fix you believe to be important and the chances, in your
opinion, of it screwing things up more than it fixes are slim, go ahead and
commit it...
Maybe I've already done what's needed, I'm not quite sure how this
If it's a bug fix you believe to be important and the chances, in your
opinion, of it screwing things up more than it fixes are slim, go ahead and
commit it...
Zeev
At 14:20 24-09-01, Stig Venaas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:05:24PM +0200, Stig Venaas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
AFAIK he just committed it (today)
Yes, but he sent it tome a week ago or so nevertheless :)
If nobody objects I will merge the fix into the 4_0_5 branch
later this evening. (hopefully before Zeev creates the RC3..)
