[PHP-DEV] Re: The rand() can of worms

2001-09-05 Thread jeroen
Bad points: 1) Leaks 2) Inconsistent style 3) Really bizzare macros, etc. Let's put one thing straigt: I merged it already in this early stage (I KNEW it wasn't yet the way it should be, for example the macro thingy: It started out as 2line-macro's, but went bigger. In the optimization and

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The rand() can of worms

2001-09-05 Thread George Schlossnagle
I really dislike the way you are handling with this issue: first silently agree, I keep seeing this thrown around. 'Silent approval' is an interesting concept. How do you distinguish it from 'silent disapproval'? Are you sure you didn't make an assumption about the way people felt? (We

[PHP-DEV] Re: The rand() can of worms

2001-09-05 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
I *NEVER* have anything to say until I have seen the code. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of castles in the air. Okay, that's a point. That is not the custom where I learnwork, actually, there is a saying that design planning is 67% of the job, implementing just 33%. That is if you want a good

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The rand() can of worms

2001-09-05 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Maybe you don't understand my way of coding (emphasis on CORRECTNESS, the rest comes in later stages). In fact I was REALLY in fast-coding mode because I wanted to commit/merge it before the big part of that introduction I was co-organising. I thought you would be able to discuss it, so after