Yep I agree. It can sense to sort a one element array because it might be
coming from an external source.
Andi
At 04:47 PM 6/26/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I'd say that this is a bug, and needs to be fixed.
Zeev
At 15:40 26/6/2001, Andre Langhorst wrote:
Hi,
apparently php-users are fooled (bug 9633, private email to me) by zends
sorting on one-element arrays. In fact we do nothing there.
if (ht-nNumOfElements = 1) { /* Doesn't require sorting */
return SUCCESS;
}
but zend_hash_sort is called with renumber=1 for sort() and the like.
thus any array with size1 will be renumbered except the one element
array, that one is returned unchanged. shoudn't have renumbering an
effect on one-element arrays even if there is nothing to sort?
POV 1)
One element, nothing to sort. Simply return it.
Problem: inconsistent behaviour
POV 2)
Renumber arrays with size1, renumber all.
Problem: backwards compatibilty.
well, I am unsure. To not have the BC problem we should at least document
this, because experience shows that people do expect that sort() acts
similar on all arrays and renumbers even one-element arrays.
ok. why would you sort a one-element array? I wouldn't, but people
apparently do and I can understand this kind of inconsistency assuming.
andré
· [EMAIL PROTECTED] m: +49 173 9558736 ·
* PHP Quality Assurance http://qa.php.net *
--
Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]