Everyone - please read about this already hashed-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt 
topic in the mailing list archive.
PHP 4.0 is not going to have destructors, ever.  Its design simply doesn't 
allow for it.

Zeev

At 17:34 17/4/2001, Alberto wrote:
>Yes, destructor ... it's a good thing to have...
>
>David Guerizec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Peter \"[DiSAStA]\" Petermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi stas,
> > >
> > > > JT>> >  Ah, that's another way to say "When Andi and Zeev implement
>it" :-)
> > > > JT>>
> > > > JT>> Like..never? :)
> > > > Generally, since PHP is not a strongly typed language, it's not too
>hard
> > > > to implement multiple inheritance, I guess. Question is - is it worth
>the
> > > > effort? Does it need to be done?
> > > mh.. would be real great for some things...
> > > well, the typical PHP-Coder doesnt need it,
> > > but, in some cases it could be usefull...
> >
> > IMHO, a more usful thing to see before multiple inheritance would be
>proper constructor (and eventually destructor) callings...
> >
> > > Peter Petermann
> > >
> > > --
> > > /* ZIMT - where PHP meets needs*
> > >  * [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.phpug.de
> > >  * [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.cyberfly.net
> > > */
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > David Guerizec
> >
> > --
> > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
>--
>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CTO &  co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to