Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
Quoting Harald Radi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: is there a reason why a namespace should contain anything other than classes ? we have static functions and static members in classes, no need for them in namespaces too. We don't have static members. And we need namespaces for constants, also. -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some fallen angels have their good reasons. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
We don't have static members.
but we will in ze2 !?
And we need namespaces for
constants, also.
why ?
class Foo {
final $BAR = blah;
}
namespace Foo;
class Bar {
static function bar() {
echo $Foo::BAR;
}
}
if (Foo::Bar::bar() === $Foo::BAR) {
echo juhuuu;
} else {
echo damn;
}
you have classes, you have constants, you have functions, ... what more
do you want ?
harald.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
Quoting Harald Radi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And we need namespaces for
constants, also.
why ?
class Foo {
final $BAR = blah;
}
I'm sorry, I haven't been following all of this - is 'final' a keyword that
will be available (and enforced) in ze2?
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some fallen angels have their good reasons.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
I'm sorry, I haven't been following all of this - is 'final' a keyword that will be available (and enforced) in ze2? i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class / namespace ? -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Harald Radi wrote:
why ?
class Foo {
final $BAR = blah;
}
namespace Foo;
class Bar {
static function bar() {
echo $Foo::BAR;
}
}
if (Foo::Bar::bar() === $Foo::BAR) {
echo juhuuu;
} else {
echo damn;
}
you have classes, you have constants, you have functions, ... what more
do you want ?
I don't think emulating constants with static members is a good idea.
For one, it'd require introducing 'final' keyword and so on.
-Andrei
* I don't mind going nowhere as long as it's an interesting path. *
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Harald Radi wrote: i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class / namespace ? echo Foo::CONSTANT; -Andrei Try to spend the next 30 seconds not thinking about a blue-eyed polar bear. -Feodor Dostoevsky -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class / namespace ? echo Foo::CONSTANT; yes, but how do you define them ? if it's like this: namespace Foo; define(CONSTANT, 123); it won't be a problem either because then a class can't contain such a definition (yet) and there won't be any ambiguities too. harald. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Harald Radi wrote: yes, but how do you define them ? if it's like this: namespace Foo; define(CONSTANT, 123); it won't be a problem either because then a class can't contain such a definition (yet) and there won't be any ambiguities too. That's how I was thinking they would be defined. Funny, but my automated signature somehow seems relevant to this. -Andrei In this age, which believes that there is a short cut to everything, the greatest lesson to be learned is that the most difficult way is, in the long run, the easiest. -Henry Miller, The Books in My Life -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:19:01PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote: i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class / namespace ? echo Foo::CONSTANT; yes, but how do you define them ? if it's like this: namespace Foo; define(CONSTANT, 123); On perhaps optionally: define(CONSTANT, 123, 'Foo'); ... which will define the constant in the namespace 'Foo'. It might also make sense to allow: define(Foo::CONSTANT, 123); -- Jon Parise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . Information Technology (2001) http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
