On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:27:51 +0100
Vincent Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a bug
I'm not the only one, look #22292
And then it's a duplicate, and therefor marked bogus.
If you have any additional information that can be useful, not already known,
please add it to that bug.
/
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:34:21AM +0100, Magnus M wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:27:51 +0100
Vincent Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a bug
I'm not the only one, look #22292
And then it's a duplicate, and therefor marked bogus.
If you have any
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:41:56 +0800
James Devenish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So...this thread is discussing #22291 (which Vincent Robert) submitted.
He then comments that bug #22292 (posted half an hour after his)
indicates the same problem but is told by two people that his (earlier)
bug is
