On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 12:14 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> Getting back to this...
>
> It looks like there's a couple of different threads here, which I will try
> to separate:
>
> 1) Code Manifesto vs Contributor Covenant. I really wish we wouldn't get
> hung up and side tracked on this,
Getting back to this...
It looks like there's a couple of different threads here, which I will try to
separate:
1) Code Manifesto vs Contributor Covenant. I really wish we wouldn't get hung
up and side tracked on this, honestly. That said, I read over the CC v2 link
that Lukas posted and it
To chime in quickly as someone from the Symfony CARE team, who now has quite
some time of direct experience, and the CoC training. The training was very
valuable, even for someone who thought they were experienced like me I learnt a
lot. Highly recommend it.
Without an enforcement concept in
I agree with Lukas' points.
While we adopted the Code Manifesto for ZF some years back, the problem we
ran into was a lack of reporting guidelines; it's essentially an optimistic
"be nice to each other and consider the impact your words/actions have on
others" directive, with no recourse when
Aloha,
thank you for bringing this up again.
there were already quite a few comments on the PR at the time, which
interested people should have a look at.
I also share the concern that this CoC lacks explicitness which is why I
also favor a covenant of code based CoC. this is what we created
Hi folks.
Last year I proposed a CoC for FIG, based on the Code Manifesto by Graham
Daniels. It was subsequently edited a bit by former FIG Secretary Margaret
Staples. I left it lie for a bit in the hopes that Margaret's changes would be
merged back into the Code Manifesto proper, but that