1. English is not my first language, so what I said may seem offensive,
although I did not want this.
2. If there are rules, then no one bothered to acquaint me with them
3. When has openness/truthfulness become not civilized and unacceptable? I
think dialogue must be simple and clear, without
Anton please keep it to a civil tone. Talking about "mistification" is not
friendly nor acceptable here.
As already said by MWOP, supporting PSR-7 alone has absolutely sense, and
there are tons of packages that do that, because they care only about
working on requests, not creating them.
Il
See my previous comment to Matthew Weier O'Phinney, can u do this? If u
cant this disscussion is mistification.
вторник, 15 октября 2019 г., 22:39:58 UTC+3 пользователь Alexandru
Pătrănescu написал:
>
> The pattern that PSR-7 promote is the use of immutable objects.
> It is maybe a bit harder
Immutable objects is not problem. I never talked that. But I see hard
dependencies between PSR-7 and PSR-17 in real applications - you cant
create eggs without chicken...
вторник, 15 октября 2019 г., 22:39:58 UTC+3 пользователь Alexandru
Pătrănescu написал:
> The pattern that PSR-7 promote is
Hi Anton,
>
> *Not reusable/resettable objects it`s potential problem in future.**Yes,
> we can send factories or add empty instances, but it's harder than add
> method to reset content.*
The pattern that PSR-7 promote is the use of immutable objects.
It is maybe a bit harder to use, in some
There are many contradictions in your comment. If you can replace/reset my
FiltredStream from other example to new in any RequestInterface
implementation without PSR-17, just show how do it - code please.
вторник, 15 октября 2019 г., 1:32:46 UTC+3 пользователь Matthew Weier
O'Phinney написал:
If you replace psr-17 to same your interfaces/classes then it's not "just
fine" for me. In your case, external packages included my package cant use
any PSR-7 package with my package.
вторник, 15 октября 2019 г., 1:32:46 UTC+3 пользователь Matthew Weier
O'Phinney написал:
>
> You can use PSR-7
At first, I not last in chain - my package used in other packages and I
they can add filters or something like this to his StreamInterface
implementations. As a result, difference in writed content. See up - I
already add Stream examles for display this.
вторник, 15 октября 2019 г., 1:32:46
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:25 AM Anton Fedonjuk
wrote:
> *Not reusable/resettable objects it`s potential problem in future.*
> *Yes, we can send factories or add empty instances, but it's harder than
> add method to reset content.*
>
>
Resetting content means _resetting the StreamInterface
*Not reusable/resettable objects it`s potential problem in future.*
*Yes, we can send factories or add empty instances, but it's harder than
add method to reset content.*
My current code:
abstract class HttpGateway extends Gateway
{
protected $client;
protected $request;
protected
*Not reusable/resettable objects it`s potential problem in future.*
*Yes, we can send factories or add empty instances, but it's harder than
add method to reset content.*
My current code:
abstract class HttpGateway extends Gateway
{
protected $client;
protected $request;
protected
Other StreamInterface implementation not guarantee similar contents -
compatible
!= identical.
суббота, 12 октября 2019 г., 16:23:32 UTC+3 пользователь Martijn van der
Ven написал:
>
> Also note that you can use any StreamInterface implementation.
>
--
You received this message because you
You cant do this. How u create new FiltredStream?
суббота, 12 октября 2019 г., 16:23:32 UTC+3 пользователь Martijn van der
Ven написал:
>
> it is much better to initiate a new Stream and use that through the
> withBody() method. This is especially true if you do not know the
> underlying
if stream not writable then we can replace it to any writeble stream.
суббота, 12 октября 2019 г., 16:23:32 UTC+3 пользователь Martijn van der
Ven написал:
>
> How will you hande read-only Streams?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework
To make something that is compatible with unknown third-party
implementations of PSR, I would do something like this:
class MySpecialRequestHandler
{
private $streamFactory;
public function __construct(StreamFactoryInterface $streamFactory)
{
$this->streamFactory =
These are not copies of the current StreamtInterface implementation
returned $this->request->getBody()
I am trying to create a class/method that works with any third-party
RequestInterface implementation.
I do not know the architecture of StreamtInterface implementation used in
the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 6:42 PM Anton Fedonjuk
wrote:
> Class contains method setRequest(RequestInterface $request), his abstact
> code:
> Request body already sets: $request->getBody()->write('...');
> I want send this request with other body content, but dont know how:
> 1. StreamInterface don't
You know only: $request instanceof RequestInterface, you dont know other
details and can use only methods/classes defined in RequestInterface.
пятница, 11 октября 2019 г., 3:29:23 UTC+3 пользователь Woody Gilk написал:
>
> Not sure what you mean, StreamFactoryInterface is designed to create new
Also PSR-7 not "include" PSR-17 - maybe that stream created without
factory, we dont know.
пятница, 11 октября 2019 г., 3:05:42 UTC+3 пользователь Woody Gilk написал:
>
> Create a new stream using PSR-17 StreamFactory.
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:42 PM Anton Fedonjuk > wrote:
>
>> Class
Not sure what you mean, StreamFactoryInterface is designed to create new
streams from strings, files, or existing resources. As the editor of
PSR-17, I am quite sure this is the case.
--
Woody Gilk
https://www.shadowhand.com
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:24 PM Anton Fedonjuk
wrote:
> Nope, u dont
Nope, u dont know factory class name
пятница, 11 октября 2019 г., 3:05:42 UTC+3 пользователь Woody Gilk написал:
>
> Create a new stream using PSR-17 StreamFactory.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To
Create a new stream using PSR-17 StreamFactory.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:42 PM Anton Fedonjuk
wrote:
> Class contains method setRequest(RequestInterface $request), his abstact
> code:
> Request body already sets: $request->getBody()->write('...');
> I want send this request with other body
Class contains method setRequest(RequestInterface $request), his abstact
code:
Request body already sets: $request->getBody()->write('...');
I want send this request with other body content, but dont know how:
1. StreamInterface don't have methods as PHP ftruncate()
2. Constructor not defined in
23 matches
Mail list logo
