Re: [VOTE] PSR-6 Errata

For some reason I didn't even see this vote until the closing post and Larry's follow-up. Very sorry, I've been busy. Thought I was keeping up better. :-( Regards, Adam Culp On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 11:39:50 AM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote: > > Hm. Well, I had been planning to offer an

Re: [VOTE] PSR-6 Errata

Please, offer the alternative, let's discuss and vote Symfony will definitely vote +1 for it as we think this is VERY important to "fix" this. Thanks, Fabien On 9/5/16 08:39, Larry Garfield wrote: Hm. Well, I had been planning to offer an alternate vote on using InvalidArgumentException

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 IBMiToolkit On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 12:26:50 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published

Re: [Review][Discuss] FIG 3.0 Upcoming Vote

Michael, > On Aug 29, 2016, at 03:56, Michael Cullum wrote: > > The intention of the vote is that it will resolve contention, not create it; > and this should be the case so long as people don't intend to create drama as > a result of the vote. The proposal, and the

Re: [REVIEW] PSR-13: Link definition interfaces

Top posting because I will not touch on every point but do want to make the context available if desired. I found Paul's statement about doing it as an interop project valid, though instead of "should" I would have used "could" or "might benefit". At the end of the day we indeed can do

Re: [VOTE] PSR-6 Errata

Hm. Well, I had been planning to offer an alternate vote on using InvalidArgumentException should the first one fail, as that was the most likely objection. However, if the vote didn't even meet quorum then I don't know if it's even worth doing that. Hopefully should FIG 3 pass the Core

Re: [REVIEW] PSR-13: Link definition interfaces

Hi all, > On Sep 4, 2016, at 10:57, Michael Cullum wrote: > > As a general secretarial note, the minimum 2 week review period is now > complete as of the 30th August and this can be put to a vote at any time from > this point onwards. As a general

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 from Aura/Solar/etc. -- Paul M. Jones http://paul-m-jones.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 from Horde Zitat von Michael Cullum : Hi all,   The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members.   STATUS QUO: The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by the PHP FIG

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 from Yii. On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 7:26:50 PM UTC+3, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by >

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 from Phing On 04-09-16 18:26, Michael Cullum wrote: > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they > are unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published > by the PHP FIG must have the

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 from Contao -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

Hi, -1 from Revive Adserver On 04/09/2016 18:26, Michael Cullum wrote: Hi all, The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members. *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by the PHP FIG must have