On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 11:36:34 PM UTC+2, Joshua Drake wrote:
>
> I have been watching this thread since I originally posted. I have to say:
>
> HAHAHAHHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAH
>
> The leadership of this community has shown itself to be a joke or at least
> inept. Everyone is so worried
Ah, Xenforo also has multiple choice voting, if that is all that is meant
with STV. Xenforo also has timed voting, which I believe is also necessary.
You're going to also need some sort of permissions system too, right? Read
only. Voting. Administering. That is also already done and ready to be
The software I suggested, Xenforo, has everything except STV.
If I may ask, why is STV needed? Sounds awfully complicated for the
purposes of FIG. Or would the usage of STV mean, anyone in the community
will be able to vote?
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
>
> Quite honestly, I have not seen a CoC that would cover what is currently
> being discussed to a degree of certainty sufficient to have a clear guide
> line how to react.
I'd suggest, make an new rules for the current situation only. You don't
need to cover all eventualities for civil
On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 1:30:03 AM UTC+2, Christopher Pitt wrote:
>
> Finally, to the complainants: you wanted to hang me, so start tying the
>> noose and call the vote.
>>
> That is uncalled for. Asking for something to be addressed/discussed is in
> no way a desire to hang you. This
