Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-11 ContainerInterface

2017-01-31 Thread Andres Gutierrez
+1 from Phalcon On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 10:35:28 UTC-5, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > After a couple months of review, and no additional tweaks during the > last couple weeks, we are ready to initiate an acceptance vote for > PSR-11. > > Please find the specification here: > > - >

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-13: Link Definition Interfaces

2016-11-14 Thread Andres Gutierrez
+1 from Phalcon On Monday, 31 October 2016 16:15:59 UTC-5, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > Per the by-laws, the required review period has passed for the > proposed standard PSR-13 (Link Definition Interfaces). No changes have > been made in the past two weeks since re-opening the review

Re: [Important] [Internals] All projects must declare intention to remain members

2016-10-05 Thread Andres Gutierrez
Phalcon remains member On Sunday, 2 October 2016 18:44:02 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: > > As per the FIG 3.0 bylaws, all member projects must, between the 1st > October and 31st October, declare they wish to remain a member project of > the FIG. If you don't wish to remain, then it would be

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-09 Thread Andres Gutierrez
-1 from Phalcon On Sunday, 4 September 2016 11:26:50 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by >

Re: [Vote] Require Aura project to replace its representative

2016-07-29 Thread Andres Gutierrez
-1 from Phalcon On Thursday, 28 July 2016 18:56:52 UTC-5, Samantha QuiƱones wrote: > > All, > > The discussion period having concluded, I am now opening a vote on the > matter of the proposal to require the Aura project to name a new voting > representative. > > The discussion thread is