On Monday, October 29, 2018 at 3:57:10 AM UTC-5, Alessandro Lai wrote:
>
> And I hereby declare the vote closed, as of midnight.
>
> With this, PSR-18 is approved with an unanimous vote from the CC! I'll
> address the relevant PRs this morning; since it was discussed elsewhere,
> I'll add
And I hereby declare the vote closed, as of midnight.
With this, PSR-18 is approved with an unanimous vote from the CC! I'll
address the relevant PRs this morning; since it was discussed elsewhere,
I'll add references to the implementations in the meta doc.
Il giorno sabato 27 ottobre 2018
+1
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, 6:59 am Cees-Jan Kiewiet, wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:28 PM Lukas Kahwe Smith
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> regards,
>> Lukas
>>
>> > On 21 Oct 2018, at 18:05, Larry Garfield
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > --Larry Garfield
>> >
>> >> On Sunday, October 14,
+1
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:28 PM Lukas Kahwe Smith
wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> Lukas
>
> > On 21 Oct 2018, at 18:05, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > --Larry Garfield
> >
> >> On Sunday, October 14, 2018 9:46:40 AM CDT Sara Golemon wrote:
> >> The REVIEW period for the proposed
+1
regards,
Lukas
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 18:05, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> +1
>
> --Larry Garfield
>
>> On Sunday, October 14, 2018 9:46:40 AM CDT Sara Golemon wrote:
>> The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-18, HTTP Clients, hit its minimum
>> required length on 19 September 2018. We
+1
--Larry Garfield
On Sunday, October 14, 2018 9:46:40 AM CDT Sara Golemon wrote:
> The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-18, HTTP Clients, hit its minimum
> required length on 19 September 2018. We continued the period since then to
> iron out additional clarifications to the specification,
+1
- Chris Tankersley
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:46 AM Sara Golemon wrote:
> The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-18, HTTP Clients, hit its minimum
> required length on 19 September 2018. We continued the period since then to
> iron out additional clarifications to the specification, which
+1
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:38 PM Samantha Quiñones
wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
+1
On Sunday, October 14, 2018 at 9:46:40 AM UTC-5, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-18, HTTP Clients, hit its minimum
> required length on 19 September 2018. We continued the period since then to
> iron out additional clarifications to the specification, which
+1 from me...
CRB
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, 09:46 Sara Golemon wrote:
> The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-18, HTTP Clients, hit its minimum
> required length on 19 September 2018. We continued the period since then to
> iron out additional clarifications to the specification, which have all
>
On Sunday, October 14, 2018 at 9:46:40 AM UTC-5, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-18, HTTP Clients, hit its minimum
> required length on 19 September 2018. We continued the period since then to
> iron out additional clarifications to the specification, which have
The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-18, HTTP Clients, hit its minimum
required length on 19 September 2018. We continued the period since then to
iron out additional clarifications to the specification, which have all
since been merged.
At this time, I am opening an ACCEPTANCE VOTE. Per the
14 matches
Mail list logo
