It's weird to see that almost no one seems to be concerned by those
questions ?
Le vendredi 4 août 2017 00:25:19 UTC+2, Georges L. a écrit :
>
>
>
> Le mercredi 2 août 2017 11:59:01 UTC+2, Jason Judge a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 20:01:15 UTC+1, Georges L. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Le mercredi 2 août 2017 11:59:01 UTC+2, Jason Judge a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 20:01:15 UTC+1, Georges L. wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Le mardi 1 août 2017 05:49:22 UTC+2, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>>>
>>> On 07/30/2017 09:34 AM, Georges L. wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> today during
On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 20:01:15 UTC+1, Georges L. wrote:
>
>
>
> Le mardi 1 août 2017 05:49:22 UTC+2, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>>
>> On 07/30/2017 09:34 AM, Georges L. wrote:
>>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> today during a new test implementation (I am the Lead behind
>> PhpFastCache) I got a major
Le mardi 1 août 2017 05:49:22 UTC+2, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>
> On 07/30/2017 09:34 AM, Georges L. wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> today during a new test implementation (I am the Lead behind PhpFastCache)
> I got a major question on a concept of the Psr6:
>
> 1) If you set a cache item with a
On 07/30/2017 09:34 AM, Georges L. wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> today during a new test implementation (I am the Lead behind
> PhpFastCache) I got a major question on a concept of the Psr6:
>
> 1) If you set a cache item with a TTL of 1sec, then your script
> duration take more than 2secondes: What's
Hello folks,
today during a new test implementation (I am the Lead behind PhpFastCache)
I got a major question on a concept of the Psr6:
1) If you set a cache item with a TTL of 1sec, then your script duration
take more than 2secondes: What's the expected behavior of isHit() ?
Supposing that