Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-21 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
I was AFK the last few days, so I didn't get a chance to announce the results until today. They are as follows: - Number of votes: 11 - Quorum met? Yes - Number of votes +1: 11 - Number of votes +0: 0 - Number of votes -1: 0 The motion passes, and the PSR-17 (HTTP Message Factories) working group

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-19 Thread Samantha QuiƱones
+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@goo

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-12 Thread Chris Tankersley
+1 -Chris Tankersley On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney < mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 > working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and > then evidently forgot to open a vote for i

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-10 Thread Korvin Szanto
+1 On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 4:38 PM Sara Golemon wrote: > On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 1:22:37 PM UTC-5, Matthew Weier O'Phinney > wrote: >> >> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 >> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and >> then evide

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-10 Thread Sara Golemon
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 1:22:37 PM UTC-5, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 > working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and > then evidently forgot to open a vote for it. > > So, I'm opening a vote

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-06 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
+1 assuming this is about https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/tree/master/proposed/http-factory > On 05 Feb 2018, at 19:22, Matthew Weier O'Phinney > wrote: > > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 > working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-l

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-05 Thread Beau Simensen
+1 On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 12:22:37 PM UTC-6, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 > working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and > then evidently forgot to open a vote for it. > > So, I'm opening a

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-05 Thread Larry Garfield
+1 --Larry Garfield On Monday, February 5, 2018 12:22:25 PM CST Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 > working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and > then evidently forgot to open a vote for it. > > So, I'm op

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-05 Thread Cees-Jan Kiewiet
+1 On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Michael Cullum wrote: > +1 from me. > > For easy reference for others: > https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/ > proposed/http-factory/http-factory-meta.md#1-summary (Summary, Scope and > Why Bother?) > > Michael > > On Monday, 5 February 2018 1

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-05 Thread Michael Cullum
+1 from me. For easy reference for others: https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/proposed/http-factory/http-factory-meta.md#1-summary (Summary, Scope and Why Bother?) Michael On Monday, 5 February 2018 18:22:37 UTC, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > Last year, in May, I opened

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-05 Thread Stefano Torresi
+1 Il giorno lun 5 feb 2018 alle ore 19:23 Matthew Weier O'Phinney < mweierophin...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Clearly, a +1 from me. > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney > wrote: > > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 > > working group, as

Re: [CC][VOTE] PSR-17 Working Group

2018-02-05 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Clearly, a +1 from me. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17 > working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and > then evidently forgot to open a vote for it. > > So, I'm opening a v