I was AFK the last few days, so I didn't get a chance to announce the
results until today. They are as follows:
- Number of votes: 11
- Quorum met? Yes
- Number of votes +1: 11
- Number of votes +0: 0
- Number of votes -1: 0
The motion passes, and the PSR-17 (HTTP Message Factories) working
group
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@goo
+1
-Chris Tankersley
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <
mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and
> then evidently forgot to open a vote for i
+1
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 4:38 PM Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 1:22:37 PM UTC-5, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> wrote:
>>
>> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
>> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and
>> then evide
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 1:22:37 PM UTC-5, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
>
> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and
> then evidently forgot to open a vote for it.
>
> So, I'm opening a vote
+1
assuming this is about
https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/tree/master/proposed/http-factory
> On 05 Feb 2018, at 19:22, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> wrote:
>
> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-l
+1
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 12:22:37 PM UTC-6, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
>
> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and
> then evidently forgot to open a vote for it.
>
> So, I'm opening a
+1
--Larry Garfield
On Monday, February 5, 2018 12:22:25 PM CST Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and
> then evidently forgot to open a vote for it.
>
> So, I'm op
+1
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Michael Cullum wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> For easy reference for others:
> https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/
> proposed/http-factory/http-factory-meta.md#1-summary (Summary, Scope and
> Why Bother?)
>
> Michael
>
> On Monday, 5 February 2018 1
+1 from me.
For easy reference for others:
https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/proposed/http-factory/http-factory-meta.md#1-summary
(Summary, Scope and Why Bother?)
Michael
On Monday, 5 February 2018 18:22:37 UTC, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
>
> Last year, in May, I opened
+1
Il giorno lun 5 feb 2018 alle ore 19:23 Matthew Weier O'Phinney <
mweierophin...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Clearly, a +1 from me.
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> wrote:
> > Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
> > working group, as
Clearly, a +1 from me.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
> Last year, in May, I opened a discussion period regarding the PSR-17
> working group, as the proposal pre-dated the latest by-laws... and
> then evidently forgot to open a vote for it.
>
> So, I'm opening a v
12 matches
Mail list logo