Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
My next project will be a kind of online photo viewer. All of these
photos will need to have watermark applied to them. The problem is
that, depending on the picture, different watermarks need to be
applied. The easiest solution would be to process these picture
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
My next project will be a kind of online photo viewer. All of these photos
will need to have watermark applied to them. The problem is that, depending
on the picture, different watermarks need to be
Bernhard Kohl wrote:
I think it also depends on the size of your images. If they are huge
megapixel files processing them on the fly might cause severe lag.
Still adding a watermark to an image with 100-200 thousand pixels is
done within milliseconds on a modern machine.
(You probably
@Per Jessen
Disk-space is cheap, especially if you don't need to be worried about
backup etc. I'm not sure why you think applying watermarks in an
off-line process would any less manageable than doing it on-line.
Well, the processing will be online in the sense that it will be triggered
via an
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Less manegeable becouse I would have to keep copies of the pictures on
the disk. If I ever want to change these watermarks, I would have to
somehow recreate them. It is more work to do than if I used the
per-request runtime applying of watermark approach, since
Hello,
My next project will be a kind of online photo viewer. All of these photos
will need to have watermark applied to them. The problem is that, depending
on the picture, different watermarks need to be applied. The easiest
solution would be to process these picture at runtime using GD, apply
6 matches
Mail list logo
