Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 23:19 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
function getMax($table, $field)
If I saw this sort of code I'd be appalled! It's possibly the worst way
to get the auto increment value. You won't notice it testing the site
out on your own, but all hell will break
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:39:29AM +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
> > you can bet you ass that every other DB out there that's worth it's salt
> > has atomic id incrementor functionality exposed in some way or other.
> >
> > @Rene: all that talk of
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
> you can bet you ass that every other DB out there that's worth it's salt
> has atomic id incrementor functionality exposed in some way or other.
>
> @Rene: all that talk of maxId functions and random retries etc, etc, is
> complete pooh.
> don'
Op 2/3/10 12:19 AM, Ashley Sheridan schreef:
> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:21 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
>
>> the auto_increment sytnax is not uniform across servers, is it?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Ashley Sheridan
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I saw it happen on a site that was getting only about
Lol, damn iPod corrections. The app designers is what was meant.
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Feb 2, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Robert Cummings
wrote:
Phpster wrote:
Yep, love those race conditions. We have them all over the app cuz
the app ciders don't know shit!
Mmmm... apple cider... to cu
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:19:29PM +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
> oh, on using adodb.sf.net and 0-overhead for jumping between mysql and
> postgresql;
>
> keep all your queries to as simple & early-standard sql as possible.
> the auto_increment incompatibilities can be circumvented with a
> relativ
Robert Cummings wrote:
*snip*
Einstein I believe said something along the lines of
"A smart person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it in the first place"
Might not have been Einstein, but anyway ...
Do you mean the following quote?
The difference between a smart person and a wise
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Rene Veerman wrote:
eh thats "randomize the timing of the retry attempt"..
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
and after the sleep(rand(1,3)) it might need a short loop like this;
$rnd = rand(1,9); $a=0;
for ($i=0; $i<$rn
Robert Cummings wrote:
Rene Veerman wrote:
eh thats "randomize the timing of the retry attempt"..
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
and after the sleep(rand(1,3)) it might need a short loop like this;
$rnd = rand(1,9); $a=0;
for ($i=0; $i<$rnd; $i++) { $a++ }
to furt
Rene Veerman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
The problem is where 2 people choose the same instant to perform an
action on your site that inserts a record into your db. The db engine
inserts them one after the other, and then responds about the max(id) to
your PH
Phpster wrote:
Yep, love those race conditions. We have them all over the app cuz the
app ciders don't know shit!
Mmmm... apple cider... to cure what ails you or at least get you drunk
enough to not care about the horrible race conditions >:)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Applica
Rene Veerman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
It's the reason transactions exist, to prevent things happening like this.
When you have two actions where one is dependent on the other, unless you
have a way to tie them together so that they can't be broken, you run
Rene Veerman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
The problem is where 2 people choose the same instant to perform an
action on your site that inserts a record into your db. The db engine
inserts them one after the other, and then responds about the max(id) to
your PH
Rene Veerman wrote:
eh thats "randomize the timing of the retry attempt"..
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
and after the sleep(rand(1,3)) it might need a short loop like this;
$rnd = rand(1,9); $a=0;
for ($i=0; $i<$rnd; $i++) { $a++ }
to further randomize the retry
Rene Veerman wrote:
i haven't had the pleasure yet of writing for sites that generate so many
hits/sec that
they'd update the max value of any table at exactly the same time.
i usually ask for the max value about 2 milliseconds before doing the
insert.
And if the insert fails, i can auto-retry v
Good lord that is exacty the same logic applied in our app. It only
takes about 100 users to create the issue.
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Rene Veerman wrote:
i haven't had the pleasure yet of writing for sites that generate so
many
hits/sec that
they'd update t
Yep, love those race conditions. We have them all over the app cuz the
app ciders don't know shit!
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Feb 2, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 23:19 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
function getMax($table, $field)
If I saw this sort
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> It's the reason transactions exist, to prevent things happening like this.
> When you have two actions where one is dependent on the other, unless you
> have a way to tie them together so that they can't be broken, you run the
> risk of col
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:31 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>
> > The problem is where 2 people choose the same instant to perform an
> > action on your site that inserts a record into your db. The db engine
> > inserts them one after the ot
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> The problem is where 2 people choose the same instant to perform an
> action on your site that inserts a record into your db. The db engine
> inserts them one after the other, and then responds about the max(id) to
> your PHP script. Then,
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:21 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
> the auto_increment sytnax is not uniform across servers, is it?
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>
> > I saw it happen on a site that was getting only about 3000 hits a day. It
> > just takes the right combina
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:17 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
> and after the sleep(rand(1,3)) it might need a short loop like this;
> $rnd = rand(1,9); $a=0;
> for ($i=0; $i<$rnd; $i++) { $a++ }
>
> to further randomize the retry attempt..
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Rene Veerman wrot
the auto_increment sytnax is not uniform across servers, is it?
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> I saw it happen on a site that was getting only about 3000 hits a day. It
> just takes the right combination of circumstances and it all goes pear
> shaped. You really should
eh thats "randomize the timing of the retry attempt"..
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> and after the sleep(rand(1,3)) it might need a short loop like this;
> $rnd = rand(1,9); $a=0;
> for ($i=0; $i<$rnd; $i++) { $a++ }
>
> to further randomize the retry attempt..
>
>
and after the sleep(rand(1,3)) it might need a short loop like this;
$rnd = rand(1,9); $a=0;
for ($i=0; $i<$rnd; $i++) { $a++ }
to further randomize the retry attempt..
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> i haven't had the pleasure yet of writing for sites that generate
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:05 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
> i haven't had the pleasure yet of writing for sites that generate so many
> hits/sec that
> they'd update the max value of any table at exactly the same time.
>
> i usually ask for the max value about 2 milliseconds before doing the
> inser
i haven't had the pleasure yet of writing for sites that generate so many
hits/sec that
they'd update the max value of any table at exactly the same time.
i usually ask for the max value about 2 milliseconds before doing the
insert.
And if the insert fails, i can auto-retry via a wrapper function
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 23:19 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
> function getMax($table, $field)
If I saw this sort of code I'd be appalled! It's possibly the worst way
to get the auto increment value. You won't notice it testing the site
out on your own, but all hell will break loose when you start get
oh, on using adodb.sf.net and 0-overhead for jumping between mysql and
postgresql;
keep all your queries to as simple & early-standard sql as possible.
the auto_increment incompatibilities can be circumvented with a
relatively simple
function getMax($table, $field) {
in adodb, you'd loop through
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:15:22PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lars Nielsen [mailto:l...@mit-web.dk]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:24 PM
> > To: php-general@lists.php.net
> > Subject: [PHP] database abstraction laye
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars Nielsen [mailto:l...@mit-web.dk]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:24 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] database abstraction layer
>
> Hi List
>
> I am trying to make a Database Abstraction Layer so
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> Hi List
>
> I am trying to make a Database Abstraction Layer so I can which the DB
> of my application between MySQL and Postgresql. I have been looking at
> the way phpBB does it, and it seems that it is only then php-functions
> wh
i'm a fan of adodb.sf.net, which i've used with both postgresql and mysql.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> Hi List
>
> I am trying to make a Database Abstraction Layer so I can which the DB
> of my application between MySQL and Postgresql. I have been looking at
> the way ph
Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hi List
I am trying to make a Database Abstraction Layer so I can which the DB
of my application between MySQL and Postgresql. I have been looking at
the way phpBB does it, and it seems that it is only then php-functions
which are different. The SQL seems to be the same.
Is
Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hi List
I am trying to make a Database Abstraction Layer so I can which the DB
of my application between MySQL and Postgresql. I have been looking at
the way phpBB does it, and it seems that it is only then php-functions
which are different. The SQL seems to be the same.
Is
Lars Nielsen wrote:
Is it save to assume that I can use the same SQL, or should i make some
exceptions?
Standard SQL should work across all SQL servers with only a few
exceptions (for example, MySQL doesn't support full outer joins.)
Anything that has to do with server administration, howeve
Hi List
I am trying to make a Database Abstraction Layer so I can which the DB
of my application between MySQL and Postgresql. I have been looking at
the way phpBB does it, and it seems that it is only then php-functions
which are different. The SQL seems to be the same.
Is it save to assume that
( Sorry Eric - forgot to change the email address again :( )
Eric Butera wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
In some earlier thread (I really don't want to dig to find it) I argued for
running mysql_real_escape_string right on the _POST
I must concede I was definit
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
> >
> > I've looked into PDO, and I jus
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Eric Butera wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
>>>
>>> I've looked
Eric Butera wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
I've looked into PDO, and I just didn't find it as feature-rich as the
"native" (non-OO) function assortme
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>
>> PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
>
> I've looked into PDO, and I just didn't find it as feature-rich as the
> "native" (non-OO) function assortment fo
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>
> PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
I've looked into PDO, and I just didn't find it as feature-rich as the
"native" (non-OO) function assortment for database types like MySQL and
PostgreSQL. Can PDO be extended?
I
I'm personally using CI DB abstraction layer, also used zend_db, they both
good but as Eric said, I think PDO is a better option.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > In some earlier thread (I really don't want to dig
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> In some earlier thread (I really don't want to dig to find it) I argued for
> running mysql_real_escape_string right on the _POST
>
> I must concede I was definitely wrong about that.
>
> The right place to do it is in a database abstracti
Hi,
> Never used pear before, but I seem to recall there being some issues where
> pear did not provide very good forward support when moving to new versions
> of php causing a need to recode. Is that still an issue?
Don't really know. I've not really had a problem with the stuff that
I've writte
Richard Heyes wrote:
Hi,
Anywhoo, that being said, does anyone have a suggestion for a good database
abstraction class?
Ooh, I think you'll get the odd one or two...
Preferably one that already has decent support for several open source
databases?
PEAR::DB was good, but IIRC it's now been
Hi,
> Anywhoo, that being said, does anyone have a suggestion for a good database
> abstraction class?
Ooh, I think you'll get the odd one or two...
> Preferably one that already has decent support for several open source
> databases?
PEAR::DB was good, but IIRC it's now been deprecated in favo
In some earlier thread (I really don't want to dig to find it) I argued
for running mysql_real_escape_string right on the _POST
I must concede I was definitely wrong about that.
The right place to do it is in a database abstraction class that does
the actual insert for you, so that if you need
On Apr 17, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:33, Jason Pruim wrote:
Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here in programming... Maybe
it's because I delt with
Jim Lucas wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:33, Jason Pruim wrote:
Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here in programming... Maybe it's
because I delt with a kid who decided to scream for a good share
of
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:
[/snip]
Both ideas worked great... Thank you!
Now I do still have one question, I decided that what Jim put up
worked a little bit better for
Jim Lucas wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:33, Jason Pruim wrote:
Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here in programming... Maybe it's
because I delt with a kid who decided to scream for a good share of
the night and I'm
On Apr 17, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:
[/snip]
Both ideas worked great... Thank you!
Now I do still have one question, I decided that what Jim put up
worked a little bit better for me so I'm going off
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:33, Jason Pruim wrote:
Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here in programming... Maybe it's
because I delt with a kid who decided to scream for a good share of
the night and I'm sleep deprived :)
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:33, Jason Pruim wrote:
Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here in programming... Maybe it's
because I delt with a kid who decided to scream for a good share
of the night and I'm sleep deprived :) But in my current
Stut wrote:
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:33, Jason Pruim wrote:
Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here in programming... Maybe it's
because I delt with a kid who decided to scream for a good share of
the night and I'm sleep deprived :) But in my current system I have this:
echo <<
And since no word in the English language begins with FT
You're forgetting Ftork...
--
Richard Heyes
+-+
|Access SSH through a Windows mapped drive|
|http://www.phpguru.org/sftpdrive |
+-+
--
PHP General M
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SASH
>
> That should have been SSH of course - seems my spell checker isn't very
> technical...
> +-+
> |Access SSH through a Windows mapped drive|
> |http://www.phpguru.or
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Richard Heyes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I took a quick look at it, and quickly realized you know more
then me
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I took a quick look at it, and quickly realized you know more then me
> :P
> > > I'll dig into it more today hope
> SASH
That should have been SSH of course - seems my spell checker isn't very
technical...
--
Richard Heyes
+-+
|Access SSH through a Windows mapped drive|
|http://www.phpguru.org/sftpdrive |
+-+
--
PHP
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took a quick look at it, and quickly realized you know more then me :P
I'll dig into it more today hopefully once the caffeine kicks in better and
I can make a full sentence without having it take me 5
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I took a quick look at it, and quickly realized you know more then me :P
> I'll dig into it more today hopefully once the caffeine kicks in better and
> I can make a full sentence without having it take me 5 minutes :)
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:33, Jason Pruim wrote:
Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here in programming... Maybe it's
because I delt with a kid who decided to scream for a good share of
the night and I'm sleep deprived :) But in my current system I have
this:
echo <<
On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Richard Heyes wrote:
I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to
sounding like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks
to all of you. A free beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone
who has helped me over the years!
I would pref
On Apr 17, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Chris wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 16, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Chris wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
Hi Everyone!
I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to
sounding like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks
to all of you. A free beer
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 16, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Chris wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
Hi Everyone!
I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to sounding
like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks to all of
you. A free beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone who ha
On Apr 16, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Chris wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
Hi Everyone!
I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to
sounding like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks
to all of you. A free beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone
who has helped me over
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hope ya dont mind if i borrow that one :D
> >
>
> arm, have you seen my website...? :-)
>
umm; sry, havent :(
i was reading through it, and i was like; holy shit; that dudes from the
> list !! btw, i talked to the guy
Jason Pruim wrote:
Hi Everyone!
I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to sounding
like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks to all of you.
A free beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone who has helped me over
the years!
Here's my question... I have a pr
hope ya dont mind if i borrow that one :D
arm, have you seen my website...? :-)
i was reading through it, and i was like; holy shit; that dudes from the
list !! btw, i talked to the guy who wrote solar, when i was in dc last
year. really cool fellow; but i talked his ear off :O
Hope you re
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> off-subject (yes total thread robbery here [more of a side note really]).
> > i saw a reference to some of your work in the Solar framework richard, for
> > clearing out the 'environment' or rather the superglobal arrays
off-subject (yes total thread robbery here [more of a side note
really]). i saw a reference to some of your work in the Solar framework
richard, for clearing out the 'environment' or rather the superglobal
arrays. good stuff.
Thanks (I think you're referring to clearing register_globals cra
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:43:15 -0400, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone!
>
> I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to sounding
> like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks to all of
> you. A free beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone who has
Assuming a recent release of MySQL:
open the schema information_schema then
select TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME from COLUMNS where TABLE_NAME = '$table';
Steve
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to so
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to sounding like
> > I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks to all of you. A free
> > beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone who has helped me over
I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to sounding
like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks to all of you.
A free beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone who has helped me over
the years!
I would prefer hard (or soft) cash... :-)
Here's my question... I h
On 4/16/08, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to sounding like
> I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks to all of you. A free
> beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone who has helped me over the year
Hi Everyone!
I'm back with yet another question But getting closer to sounding
like I know what I'm talking about and that's all thanks to all of
you. A free beer (Or beverage of choice)* for everyone who has helped
me over the years!
Here's my question... I have a program, where I wa
Daniel Brown wrote:
Should catch(e) really be catch(Exception $e) ?
Something like that. I was paraphrasing, which seems weird, since I was
looking at the code for the class description anyway :) Thanks for the
info.
--
Ray Hauge
www.primateapplications.com
--
PHP General Mailing Lis
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Ray Hauge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been working on a project that was started from scratch. I'm a
> minimalist, so I like to keep things as simple as possible. I've been
> using this idea for a database abstraction, and I thought I'd see if I
> could
I've been working on a project that was started from scratch. I'm a
minimalist, so I like to keep things as simple as possible. I've been
using this idea for a database abstraction, and I thought I'd see if I
could get some constructive criticism.
Here is an example of how I use this first:
"Luke Woollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
> I once read a great article in the first or second issue of
> http://www.phparch.com/ on database abstraction layers. At which point I
> used the tutorial as a starting point for creating a very similar structure
> I named dbWave. There are only mi
I once read a great article in the first or second issue of
http://www.phparch.com/ on database abstraction layers. At which point I
used the tutorial as a starting point for creating a very similar structure
I named dbWave. There are only minor differences and a postgresql driver is
now included f
Hi,
Can anyone give me any pointers for creating a database abstraction class ?
I know there are a few out there already, but I'm doing this purely as an OO
learning exercise. I'm only at the paper design right now and I've only got
this far;
Properties:
Persistent - Persistent connection
-Original Message-
From: David Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: June 13, 2002 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Database Abstraction Suite
Hi all
I am busy developing a PHP DB application. I obviously want this to be
as portable as possible - and t
Hi all
I am busy developing a PHP DB application. I obviously want this to be
as portable as possible - and then went to the Zend pages.
I have looked at the DB abstraction Applications. There are five or so
which have all been rated as a four dot (I presume out of 5).
Does anyone have any ex
e-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:39 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [PHP] Database abstraction layer oci
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi everybody.
> &g
angelism
> http://www.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/whatis.htm
> OpenLink Virtuoso Internet Data Integration Server
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:39 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
March 08, 2002 5:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP] Database abstraction layer oci
>
>
>
> Hi everybody.
>
> I would like your opinion on the Database Abstraction Layer you prefer (I
> will use it with Oracle 8i)
> I know that there is Metabase end Pear
Hi everybody.
I would like your opinion on the Database Abstraction Layer you prefer (I
will use it with Oracle 8i)
I know that there is Metabase end Pear DB
What's your opinion on both or others ?
Laurent Drouet
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: htt
Hi!
I'ld like to announce the availability of a database abstraction module,
called 'dbx'.
It gives you the ability to code your database-enabled php-templates once
(for a specific database), and port to a different database later by just
changing the string "odbc" to "mysql" (e.g.) once. This
93 matches
Mail list logo
