Manuel:
What is broken with strtok() since php4.06? So far my code that use it seems
to work ok with PHP4.10...??? I'd Like to know ;)
A+
Alain
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
Hello,
Alain Samoun wrote:
Manuel:
What is broken with strtok() since php4.06? So far my code that use it seems
to work ok with PHP4.10...??? I'd Like to know ;)
If the token character is the first of the string you want to tokenize,
now strtok ignores it, before it would return an empty
You call it broken, we call it finally making them POSIX-compliant.
Whatever floats your boat.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
Alain Samoun wrote:
Manuel:
What is broken with strtok() since php4.06? So far my code that use it seems
to work ok with
Hello,
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
You call it broken, we call it finally making them POSIX-compliant.
Whatever floats your boat.
I don't disagree, but the fact is that doesn't help anybody that used
the function and relied on its original behaviour that was there for 4
years.
As for being POSIX
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Before somebody decides to repress my opinion again,
Hah! That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read!
Downloads do not imply usage, only curiosity. I've downloaded a large number
of PHP class libraries
BC was broken, this happens sometimes. The majority of the PHP Dev team
agrees that strtok() should be POSIX compliant, so it is now, and forever
will be.
Not being in NEWS/Changelog was an oversight/error, nobody is perfect.
This not happening in the future is a desire of everyone. Also,
Hello,
Mark Charette wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Before somebody decides to repress my opinion again,
Hah! That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read!
Downloads do not imply usage, only curiosity. I've downloaded a
7 matches
Mail list logo
