On Wed, April 11, 2007 3:40 pm, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> What's easy for an idiot to use is often a weak tool if you need to
> get
> a bit more serious, cf the problems with composite keys you described.
> Sure, Lego duplo is so idiot proof that a year old can bang two pieces
> each against the oth
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-04-11 16:34:27 -0300:
> 2007/4/11, Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> ># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-04-09 19:45:41 -0300:
> >> Thanks but that's not what I'm looking for. As I said before, my problem
> >> isn't to find an implementation of an ORM, but that the conce
2007/4/11, Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-04-09 19:45:41 -0300:
> Thanks but that's not what I'm looking for. As I said before, my problem
> isn't to find an implementation of an ORM, but that the concept I'm
working
> on will use a very restricted API (array ope
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-04-09 19:45:41 -0300:
> Thanks but that's not what I'm looking for. As I said before, my problem
> isn't to find an implementation of an ORM, but that the concept I'm working
> on will use a very restricted API (array operations), and I'm having trouble
> to keep it coher
2007/4/9, Tony Marston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
""Martin Alterisio"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I have a dilemma on a design where I humbly ask your help. I'm working on
> the model part of a web application (not to be understood in the "web2.0
"
> way, but in a mo
""Martin Alterisio"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I have a dilemma on a design where I humbly ask your help. I'm working on
> the model part of a web application (not to be understood in the "web2.0"
> way, but in a more general way, where anything mounted on HTTP
6 matches
Mail list logo
