Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Beall wrote:
I am doing some work where I want to do locking, and prevent scripts from
running in parallel. I see that I could use the semaphore mechanism, but
I'd like for my code to be portable, and that
On 24 Mar 2005 Joshua Beall wrote:
I realized that this sort of problem would always exist unless I had some
sort of semaphore mechanism. Once a user has *started* a transaction, they
need to be prevented from initiating a second transaction until the first
transaction has been completed.
The problem I am having is that people are double-submitting certain
transactions. My first attempt to prevent this was to store a flag in the
session record indicating whether or not certain transactions had been
completed, but this turned out to be insufficient at times because users
Joshua Beall wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Beall wrote:
I am doing some work where I want to do locking, and prevent scripts from
running in parallel. I see that I could use the semaphore mechanism, but
I'd like for my code to be
4 matches
Mail list logo
