On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
--
Graham
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
...
They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Graham Cossey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
:)
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
Hi,
A note on bytecode caching and include/include_once performance. A
while ago when we were profiling our code, we did notice that file
includes do take a noticeable percentage of overall overhead (enough
for us to look into it more deep). We are using apc cache on a
standard LAMP platform
Sorry forgot to mention that we used APC with apc.stat turned off
which will give a little bit more performance gain, but it does mean
flushing the cache on every code push (which is trivial).
Ravi
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, J Ravi Menon jravime...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A note on
On Jan 8, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Ballard aball...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings
rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
...
They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
Tacos?
Bastien
Sent from my
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 04:11, Daevid Vincent dae...@daevid.com wrote:
I think it's a case by case basis. Generally File I/O is expensive, but
then again, as you say, having everything in a couple files is also
sub-optimal for organizing and keeping things modular.
That is easily sorted out
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:11:07 -0800, dae...@daevid.com (Daevid Vincent) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
include files
of little
include files, or a few big ones?
On 1/6/2010 7:18 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
I have a flexible program, which can do many different
things according to the type of
data it is fed. Ideally the flexibility is achieved by
calling different functions,
though when
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-three-opcode-caches-compared correctly they
only double
the average speed of operation, which
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches.
They're an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
On 1/6/2010 7:18 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
I have a flexible program, which can do many different things according to the
type of
data it is fed. Ideally the flexibility is achieved by calling different
functions,
though when the functionality is ill-defined I sometimes just include
-Original Message-
From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
include files, or a few big ones?
On 1/6/2010 7:18 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote
Daevid Vincent wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
include files, or a few big ones?
On 1/6/2010 7:18 PM, clanc
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Daevid Vincent wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
include files, or a few big ones?
On 1/6/2010
16 matches
Mail list logo
