[PHP] The PHP License

2007-11-28 Thread AmirBehzad Eslami
Hi list, Below statement is borrowed from PHP License here[1]: The name PHP must not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without prior written permission. For written permission, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does this mean that saying

Re: [PHP] The PHP License

2007-11-28 Thread Daniel Brown
On Nov 28, 2007 9:39 AM, AmirBehzad Eslami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, Below statement is borrowed from PHP License here[1]: The name PHP must not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without prior written permission. For written permission

Re: [PHP] The PHP License

2007-11-28 Thread Jochem Maas
AmirBehzad Eslami wrote: Hi list, Below statement is borrowed from PHP License here[1]: The name PHP must not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without prior written permission. For written permission, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PHP] The PHP License [SOLVED]

2007-11-28 Thread AmirBehzad Eslami
Thanks Jochem and Daneil. I got it.

[PHP] Re: PHP License And Web Server Integration

2006-01-19 Thread Michelle Konzack
You should read the PHP Licence. It will tell you, that you can do what you want... ...IF you include the original Licence or one of the higher numbered versions of future versions. Please read the PHP Licence On-Line on the Website or those one, which comes with the package.

[PHP] Re: PHP License question

2004-02-13 Thread Ben Ramsey
I spoke with the good folks over at the FSF, and figured out how to do this. The PHP License itself does not restrict the use code under it. The problem was with the GPL, which restricted the use of code under the GPL being paired with code under certain types of licenses (specifically

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP License question

2004-02-13 Thread Gerard Samuel
On Friday 13 February 2004 01:27 pm, Ben Ramsey wrote: snip In addition, as a special exception, Ben Ramsey gives permission to link the code of this program with those files in the PEAR library that are licensed under the PHP License (or with modified versions of those files that use

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP License question

2004-02-13 Thread Ben Ramsey
Yup. I believe that's what you have to do in order to satisfy the restrictions in the GPL. Gerard Samuel wrote: So to clarify. If I have a piece of code that utilises PEAR's Tar class (which uses a PHP License). In order for me to distribute my piece of code (under the GPL) along with the Tar

[PHP] Re: PHP License question

2004-02-12 Thread Dan Phiffer
Ben Ramsey wrote: Now, to my question: if a PEAR package is released under the PHP license, and my product is under the GPL, can I include the PEAR package in my product? I don't know if this satisfies the legal requirement, but perhaps you could script some kind of automatic PEAR installation

[PHP] Re: PHP License question

2004-02-12 Thread Greg Beaver
understanding of how the license works. The PHP License is less restrictive than GPL. You can do anything you want with the code as long as it doesn't affect the original code's license. Ben Ramsey wrote: I currently developing a project that I wish to release under a, preferably, open-source and copy

[PHP] Is PHP License GPL?

2003-11-17 Thread Chris
I was looking for license information on the PHP site and only found The PHP License, version 3.0 http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt 1 - Is this license information only applicable to PHP version 3.0? 2 - Is there no license for Version 4+ or is this now covered by GPL? From the PHP web site: Q

Re: [PHP] Is PHP License GPL?

2003-11-17 Thread David Otton
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:44:52 -0600, you wrote: I was looking for license information on the PHP site and only found The PHP License, version 3.0 http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt 1 - Is this license information only applicable to PHP version 3.0? The licence is bundled with the software. 2