On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:11 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
> Thanks for the benchmark.
>
Yes, thanks! It has just confirmed what I have been experiencing as
well.
I am busy converting a static site to a Chisimba CMS based site at the
moment with 43 000 odd static, frontpage generated HTML pages. I
On Jan 31, 2008 10:09 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://nathan.moxune.com/arrayVsArrayIteratorReport.php
>
> at this point i must retract some of the statements i made during the
> conversation about ruby yesterday. it turns out, spl iteration is not
> twice as fast as standard
Nathan Nobbe schreef:
all,
as ive been researching SPL lately ive read several times that spl will
store only the current element of the underlying collection in memory
during iteration. articles that mention this will say that using these
iterators should afford savings when traversing large c
all,
as ive been researching SPL lately ive read several times that spl will
store only the current element of the underlying collection in memory
during iteration. articles that mention this will say that using these
iterators should afford savings when traversing large collections. well
having
4 matches
Mail list logo
