Re: [PHP] consistent PHP function names?

2003-09-22 Thread Eugene Lee
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:10:16AM -0700, Raquel Rice wrote: : : On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:22:36 +1000 : Justin French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : : I posted a similar topic a few months back. I guess the answer is : that the collaborative nature of open source, and the fact that : PHP has grown

[PHP] consistent PHP function names?

2003-09-17 Thread Eugene Lee
One thing that's always bothered me about PHP is that the function names are not terribly consistent. For example, when are underscores okay? strip_tags() has an underscore but stripslashes() does not. Also, should inverse functions be named appropriately? htmlentities() and

Re: [PHP] consistent PHP function names?

2003-09-17 Thread Justin French
I posted a similar topic a few months back. I guess the answer is that the collaborative nature of open source, and the fact that PHP has grown from very humble beginnings has meant that naming standards and conventions are a little lacking. It would've been nice if these issues were

RE: [PHP] consistent PHP function names?

2003-09-17 Thread chris . neale
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 September 2003 10:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP] consistent PHP function names? One thing that's always bothered me about PHP is that the function names are not terribly consistent. For example, when are underscores okay? strip_tags() has an underscore

RE: [PHP] consistent PHP function names?

2003-09-17 Thread Marco Schuler
Am Mit, 2003-09-17 um 14.26 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In practice, I find that all my code is wrapped up in custom functions and objects anyway - I name those quite carefully to avoid confusing myself and others, but don't need to worry too much about the naming conventions of the functions