On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:10:16AM -0700, Raquel Rice wrote:
:
: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:22:36 +1000
: Justin French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I posted a similar topic a few months back. I guess the answer is
: that the collaborative nature of open source, and the fact that
: PHP has grown
One thing that's always bothered me about PHP is that the function names
are not terribly consistent. For example, when are underscores okay?
strip_tags() has an underscore but stripslashes() does not. Also,
should inverse functions be named appropriately? htmlentities() and
I posted a similar topic a few months back. I guess the answer is that
the collaborative nature of open source, and the fact that PHP has
grown from very humble beginnings has meant that naming standards and
conventions are a little lacking.
It would've been nice if these issues were
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2003 10:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] consistent PHP function names?
One thing that's always bothered me about PHP is that the function names
are not terribly consistent. For example, when are underscores okay?
strip_tags() has an underscore
Am Mit, 2003-09-17 um 14.26 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In practice, I find that all my code is wrapped up in custom functions and
objects anyway - I name those quite carefully to avoid confusing myself and
others, but don't need to worry too much about the naming conventions of the
functions
5 matches
Mail list logo