Re: [PHP] fdup & Pipes? (New Thread)

2002-05-30 Thread Miguel Cruz
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > It's been a long time since I've programmed on Unix, but there > was a common technique used in C programs for invoking a program > & allowing the invoker to read & write via standard input/output. > I believe it used a combination of pipes & the fd

Re: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread 1LT John W. Holmes
t; -Original Message- > > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:45 AM > > To: Jonathan Rosenberg > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes? > > > > > > Yes it was. In your mes

[PHP] fdup & Pipes? (New Thread)

2002-05-30 Thread Jonathan Rosenberg
It's been a long time since I've programmed on Unix, but there was a common technique used in C programs for invoking a program & allowing the invoker to read & write via standard input/output. I believe it used a combination of pipes & the fdup function. Is it possible to emulate this behavior i

RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread Ed Gorski
l client. > >-Original Message- >From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:06 AM >To: Rasmus Lerdorf >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes? > > >Yes, I realized this after I sent my reply. >

[PHP] mail clients (was: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?)

2002-05-30 Thread Julie Meloni
JR> And, please try hard to forgive those of us who do not use the JR> "real" software approved by you & the other gods. We beg your JR> forgiveness, oh lord. I do not believe that was the point. Everyone's free to use whatever they want (The Bat! user here), just follow the courtesy guidelines

RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread Leotta, Natalie (NCI/IMS)
rdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:45 AM > To: Jonathan Rosenberg > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes? > > > Yes it was. In your message you had this header: > > In-Reply-To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread Jonathan Rosenberg
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:45 AM > To: Jonathan Rosenberg > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes? > > > Yes it was. In your message you had this header: > > In-Reply-To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Which means you hit 'Reply&#

RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Yes it was. In your message you had this header: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Which means you hit 'Reply' in your crappy Outlook program, deleted the Subject line and posted your message that way. Please don't do that. Those of us with real email clients see your "new" message inside a thr

RE: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread Jonathan Rosenberg
I have no idea what you are talking about. My message was NOT a reply to a previous post. > -Original Message- > From: Jason Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP] fdup & Pipes? > >

Re: [PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread Jason Wong
On Thursday 30 May 2002 21:44, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > It's been a long time since I've programmed on Unix, but there > was a common technique used in C programs for invoking a program > & allowing the invoker to read & write to its standard > input/output. I believe it used a combination of

[PHP] fdup & Pipes?

2002-05-30 Thread Jonathan Rosenberg
It's been a long time since I've programmed on Unix, but there was a common technique used in C programs for invoking a program & allowing the invoker to read & write to its standard input/output. I believe it used a combination of pipes & the fdup function. Is it possible to emulate this same b