On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Charlene Wroblewski wrote:
*joining the fray a little late*
What is the difference between this, Smarty and template.inc?
I have found Smarty to be unusable in my situation where a graphic designer
needs to be able to edit the html and is easily confused by non-html.
*joining the fray a little late*
What is the difference between this, Smarty and template.inc?
I have found Smarty to be unusable in my situation where a graphic
designer needs to be able to edit the html and is easily confused by
non-html.
So, I am using template.inc which is apparently
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
Or just use PHP...
Because it's a mess.
--
21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 07:32, Martin Marques wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
Or just use PHP...
Because it's a mess.
Agreed. Mr. nail,
At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
Or just use PHP...
Because it's a mess.
That's because it got out of hand.
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:28, tedd wrote:
At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
Or just use PHP...
Because
2006/6/28, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 07:32, Martin Marques wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
Or just use PHP...
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
bad or messy...
/* The Smarty way */
At 1:30 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:28, tedd wrote:
At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT,
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:55, Jon Anderson wrote:
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
bad or messy...
/* The Smarty
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:59, tedd wrote:
At 1:30 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:28, tedd wrote:
At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template
At 1:55 PM -0400 6/28/06, Jon Anderson wrote:
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a template
system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's really a matter of
preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly bad or messy...
/* The Smarty way */
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:28:43 -0400, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
Because it's a mess.
That's because it got out of hand. Now, practice the 3R's, regroup,
rethink, and redo.
Already did. That's when I started to use a template system.
At 2:02 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:55, Jon Anderson wrote:
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't
Robert Cummings wrote:
Simplistic examples don't properly illustrate the mess that occurs in
complex situations.
However, a simplistic example does properly illustrate my point nicely.
I could even take one of my complex multi-page smarty templates, run and
perl script to convert it, and end
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 14:19, Jon Anderson wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Simplistic examples don't properly illustrate the mess that occurs in
complex situations.
However, a simplistic example does properly illustrate my point nicely.
I could even take one of my complex multi-page smarty
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 14:10, tedd wrote:
At 2:02 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:55, Jon Anderson wrote:
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be
reduced to simplistic solutions.
That's right, and a template engine simplifies the complexity.
Cheers,
Rob.
Okay, whatever tools work for you.
Like we used to say in my
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be
reduced to simplistic solutions.
That's right, and a template engine simplifies the complexity.
Cheers,
Rob.
Okay,
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be reduced
to simplistic solutions.
That's right, and a template engine simplifies the complexity.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:28, John Nichel wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be
reduced to simplistic solutions.
That's right, and a
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:39, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:28, John Nichel wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be
Hey kids,
I thought I was joining a PHP list, not a snarky ego-fest. I assume
most of us are trying to get work done around here and are interested
in programming QA. Please take your squabbles off-list or re-title
them. They're off-topic and a waste of everyone's else's time. Yeah
I've
[snip]
Can anyone recommend another PHP list where there's a much higher
signal-to-noise ratio?
[/snip]
/dev/null comes to mind.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
2006/6/28, Jon Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
bad or messy...
/* The Smarty way */
Jay Blanchard wrote:
/dev/null comes to mind.
/dev/null came to my mind once. Not really sure what happened after that.
-Stut
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
1:15 PM
To: PHP-General
Subject: [PHP] cool your jets [WAS: Re: [PHP] working on a template
system...]
Hey kids,
I thought I was joining a PHP list, not a snarky ego-fest. I assume most of
us are trying to get work done around here and are interested in programming
QA. Please take your
Paul Novitski wrote:
Hey kids,
hi mom.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:11, Jochem Maas wrote:
Paul Novitski wrote:
Hey kids,
hi mom.
Dad had an operation?
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:11, Jochem Maas wrote:
Paul Novitski wrote:
Hey kids,
hi mom.
Dad had an operation?
an invalid type conversion?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 12:11 AM +0200 6/29/06, Jochem Maas wrote:
Paul Novitski wrote:
Hey kids,
hi mom.
Oh no, not another one of those talks?
What did I do this time? I wasn't anywhere near it, and no one saw me anyway.
Besides mom, you should take some time off -- you appear to be wrapped a bit
tight.
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:35, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:11, Jochem Maas wrote:
Paul Novitski wrote:
Hey kids,
hi mom.
Dad had an operation?
an invalid type conversion?
I dunno, did you try it? Did you catch anything? Maybe it needs to be
At 3:21 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Your kidding right? What you say above and what you say below are
different. You must think I'm stupid. Oh well.
Robert !
Hey, don't get shorts in a knot -- I didn't mean anything of the sort. I seldom
deliberately go out of my way to insult
At 3:28 PM -0400 6/28/06, John Nichel wrote:
reminds self to update his killfile list
--
John C. Nichel IV
Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
Dot Com Holdings of Buffalo
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
humor /* please note the humor tags */
Does that mean because I agreed with you, I'm now
At 3:39 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
When did I ask you or anyone other than Tedd if they were living in a
cave?
Yeah, that's right -- he didn't infer that anyone else lived in a cave, just me.
If you want anyone else to tell you that you live in a cave, then you'll have
to stand
At 5:34 PM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Alterisio wrote:
Have you (all of you questioning the use of templates) ever worked in a
project with more than one developer, where part of the team ARE NOT coders?
WE understand code, but that's not the case for everyone else. Graphic
designers don't like code,
Martin Alterisio wrote:
2006/6/28, Jon Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
bad or messy...
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 19:29, tedd wrote:
At 3:21 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Your kidding right? What you say above and what you say below are
different. You must think I'm stupid. Oh well.
Robert !
Hey, don't get shorts in a knot -- I didn't mean anything of the sort. I
Lol! Omg, you guys make reading my email so much more fun!
Cheers!
Micky
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
hi, i'm working on a template system. Basically i'm building raw
contents in arrays and then put them in templates by some special
tags.
for loop systems my basic array structure is like this:
$array['key'][]['keyword'] = ...
for example, for a bulletin board system, array structure for
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:22:42 +0300, sempsteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, i'm working on a template system. Basically i'm building raw
contents in arrays and then put them in templates by some
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:22:42 +0300, sempsteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, i'm working on a template system. Basically i'm building raw
contents in arrays and then put them
42 matches
Mail list logo
