Hi,
I don't think that one is quite right... Your optionals (?) are
confusing. Why [0-3]?[0-9] AND the \d?
No reason.
Why [0-9] at all (since \d is
essentially [0-9])?
Again, no reason.
Why use the discarded capture group (?:) since the
[0-3] is already optional?
It makes it look more
Richard Heyes wrote:
Hi,
I don't think that one is quite right... Your optionals (?) are
confusing. Why [0-3]?[0-9] AND the \d?
No reason.
Why [0-9] at all (since \d is
essentially [0-9])?
Again, no reason.
Why use the discarded capture group (?:) since the
[0-3] is already optional?
hate to say this but why not cater for all eventualities and just use
strtotime( $whatever );
Well it just doesn't have enough geek factor...
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing for FF, Chrome, Opera and Safari:
http://www.phpguru.org/RGraph
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Well it just doesn't have enough geek factor...
So true it hurts Mr Heyes
Lol.
and very nice work on the RGraph! just noticed it
in your tag - having a good read now :)
Thanks. Sad that IE8 won't (I think) support the canvas tag. Though
Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Opera do and it's in the
On Sep 26, 2008, at 7:23 AM, Richard Heyes wrote:
Well it just doesn't have enough geek factor...
So true it hurts Mr Heyes
Lol.
and very nice work on the RGraph! just noticed it
in your tag - having a good read now :)
Thanks. Sad that IE8 won't (I think) support the canvas tag. Though
-Original Message-
hate to say this but why not cater for all eventualities and just use
strtotime( $whatever );
Well it just doesn't have enough geek factor...
Plus, strtotime() does non-intuitive things with some inputs...
I'd insist on at least some kind of confirmation page if
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
hate to say this but why not cater for all eventualities and just use
strtotime( $whatever );
Well it just doesn't have enough geek factor...
Plus, strtotime() does non-intuitive things
Eric Butera wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
hate to say this but why not cater for all eventualities and just use
strtotime( $whatever );
Well it just doesn't have enough geek factor...
Plus, strtotime() does
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Nathan Rixham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
hate to say this but why not cater for all eventualities and just use
strtotime( $whatever );
-Original Message-
From: Frank Stanovcak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:41 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Filters and sanitizing a regexp
Is it possible to use the php filter function to sanitize a regular
expression such as to
...
Hi,
Had to have a play with this. Here's my (somewhat stricter) regex:
preg_match('/((?:[0-3]?[0-9])?\d)-([0-1]?\d)-20\d\d/', '31-12-2000', $matches);
if (!empty($matches[1]) AND $matches[1] 31) $matches = array();
if (!empty($matches[2]) AND $matches[2] 12) $matches = array();
You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Heyes
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 2:28 PM
To: Boyd, Todd M.
Cc: Frank Stanovcak; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Filters and sanitizing a regexp
...
Hi,
Had
Subject: Re: [PHP] Filters and sanitizing a regexp
...
Hi,
Had to have a play with this. Here's my (somewhat stricter) regex:
preg_match('/((?:[0-3]?[0-9])?\d)-([0-1]?\d)-20\d\d/', '31-12-2000',
$matches);
if (!empty($matches[1]) AND $matches[1] 31) $matches = array
I'd return an error. You can use this function to make sure they
entered a valid date:
http://us.php.net/checkdate
Provide a template like:
(Month/Day/Year) or for EU (Day/Month/Year)
If it's not valid, return an error and let them fix it. Chances are, if
they entered more characters than a
14 matches
Mail list logo
